MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2065754603 · doi:10.1080/15544770802367770

Equal Participation but Separate Paths?: Women's Social Capital and Turnout

2009· article· en· W2065754603 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Women Politics & Policy · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSocial Capital and Networks
Établissements canadiensQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTurnoutSocial capitalVotingReciprocity (cultural anthropology)Political capitalPolitical scienceDemographic economicsPoliticsSocial mobilitySurvey data collectionSociologySocial psychologyEconomicsPsychologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Conventional models of voter turnout lead us to expect men to vote in greater numbers than women. Yet in advanced industrialized democracies, women tend to participate in elections as much, or more, than men do. This study addresses this puzzle by drawing on the social capital literature to help explain the paradox of voter turnout for women. Women are in fact “rich” in various forms of social capital, especially more informal networks of reciprocity which are often viewed as apolitical and not measured in resource models of voter turnout. Drawing on the Canadian National Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating (NSGVP), the findings show that informal social capital helps explain why women turn out to vote at similar levels as men, despite having fewer traditional resources at their disposal. Hence, this study provides evidence that women's path to participation is different than men's. The author would like to thank Jillian Evans who provided helpful feedback on earlier drafts of this article. Keywords: voter turnoutgender gapsocial capitalreciprocitysocio‐economic resourcesCanada Notes The author would like to thank Jillian Evans who provided helpful feedback on earlier drafts of this article. 1. Clearly, there is variation among women with respect to their access to resources. Ethnic background, marital status, and immigrant status structure women's access to resources as well. 2. While voting is certainly a form of political participation, the act of voting does differ in some respects from other forms of political participation because of the relative small amount of time and civic skills required to carry out the act, and its egalitarian quality (i.e. that everyone has a right to vote and that more motivated individuals can not vote more than once). For a discussion of these differences, see Verba, Schlozman, and Brady (2001, 23–24). 3. This effectively creates a sample of respondents who were at least 18 years old at the time of interview. 4. The working weight was the population weight divided by the mean of the population weight. 5. Not surprisingly, reported turnout is higher than the actual turnout of 67 percent reported by Statistics Canada for the 1997 election. Official data is not available by gender. 6. This finding holds if the three activities that create this measure are examined individually as well, i.e. men were significantly more likely to be a member of a political party, a labor and/or professional association, and a service club and/or fraternal organization (p<.01). 7. Across the five types of activities included in the measure, women are significantly more likely to canvas, campaign or fundraise for a cause, and help organize or supervise activities for a group. There are no significant differences on the other three items. 8. Along with gender, racial and ethnic background may also impact how social capital is translated into political participation. Unfortunately, no variable is available for ethnic background in the NSGVP. However, there is evidence that informal social capital is important to women across other cleavages that shape women's experiences. When the model in Table 4 is run separately for immigrant women, the results are similar to the full sample model for women, suggesting that the importance of social capital variables is similar across sub‐groups of women (results not shown). 9. The CLARIFY program is used to conduct the simulations, as developed by King, Tomz, and Wittenberg (Citation2000). 10. For detailed work on the impact of social networks for communicating political information, see Huckfeldt and Sprague (Citation1995).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,365
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,613

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,340
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle