MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2066629373 · doi:10.1353/anl.2010.0020

Language, Society, and Culture: Introducing Anthropological Linguistics , and: Language, Society, and Culture: Exercise and Activity Manual , and: The Anthropology of Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology , and: The Anthropology of Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Workbook, Reader (review)

2010· article· en· W2066629373 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Bakker

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnthropological linguistics · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCategorization, perception, and language
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLinguistic anthropologyAnthropologyLinguisticsAnthropological linguisticsWorkbookSociologyApplied linguisticsPhilosophyClinical linguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Language, Society, and Culture: Introducing Anthropological Linguistics, and: Language, Society, and Culture: Exercise and Activity Manual, and: The Anthropology of Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology, and: The Anthropology of Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Workbook, Reader Peter Bakker Language, Society, and Culture: Introducing Anthropological Linguistics. Marcel Danesi. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press, 2008. Pp. xi + 312. $39.95 (paper). Language, Society, and Culture: Exercise and Activity Manual. Marcel Danesi. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press, 2008. Pp. iii + 91. $24.95 (paper). The Anthropology of Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Harriet Joseph Ottenheimer. 2d edition. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 2009. Pp. xxvi + 372. $94.95 (paper). The Anthropology of Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Workbook, Reader. Harriet Joseph Ottenheimer. 2d edition. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 2009. Pp. xxii + 183. $60.95 (paper). Decades after Joseph Greenberg's (1968) pioneering textbook on anthropological linguistics, teachers of courses on anthropological linguistics have a reasonable set of textbooks to choose from. Greenberg's book has been out of print for many years now. Most of the other, more recent textbooks have been reprinted several times, and are available in new revised editions. The books under review are also revised editions. Danesi's 2008 book was first published in 2004 as A Basic Course in Anthropological Linguisticsby the same publisher, and the first edition of Ottenheimer's book dates from 2006. Both textbooks are accompanied by workbooks, and Ottenheimer's book by a website as well. One's choice of a textbook will be based on several criteria: its overall quality, the level of the textbook and the degree level of the prospective students, the choice of subjects, accessibility and readability, the spectrum of languages and cultures surveyed, and the discipline—linguistics or anthropology—of the author and of the students. In this review, I discuss both textbooks in terms of these criteria. Danesi's book is highly readable and accessible; it is written from an anthropological perspective rather than a linguistic one, and is intended for an audience with little or no background knowledge in either linguistics or anthropology. It treats a wide, sometimes surprising, range of subjects, but a fairly limited range of cultures and languages, mostly Western societies. I first discuss the contents in more detail before evaluating the book. The book consists of three parts: "Language," "Language and Society," and "Language, Mind and Culture"; each part consists of four chapters. In addition, there is a fourteen-page glossary of technical terms, plus a list of references and an index. [End Page 398] Chapter 1 is a very brief introduction to definitions of language, the acquisition of languages, and some of the history of research on links between language and culture. Chapter 2 discusses the scientific study of language, including grammatical, semantic, pragmatic, and sociolinguistic approaches. Chapter 3 deals with the evolution of language—both the main principles of historical linguistics and precursors of language among animals. Chapter 4, the final chapter of part 1, discusses and illustrates the different levels of analysis in language description: phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics. Part 2, on language and society, begins with a chapter on language and social phenomena, including such topics as language and gender, stylistic differences, naming people, and artificial languages. Chapter 6, on language use, introduces speech act theory, conversational devices, and communicative competence and functions of language. In addition, the author discusses language in myths from several regions of the world. Chapter 7 treats writing systems (mostly early ones) and literacy, including the use of abbreviations and electronic communication. Chapter 8 deals with variation, and covers social and geographical dialects, pidgins and creoles, slang, loanwords, emotivity, and professional jargon. Part 3 deals partly with cognitive issues. It starts off with a chapter on Whorfianism, mostly from a lexical point of view, in which the number of words for snow and for types of seal are discussed in the context of classificatory semantics. Whorf's work on Hopi and Navaho is discussed, but little is said about recent research on mutual influence between language and culture. Further, Danesi discusses color terms and specialized vocabularies, as well as artificial languages and words with bizarre-sounding meanings in languages of the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,036
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,120

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0060,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,007
Communication savante0,0060,019
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0360,018

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,357
Écart entre enseignants0,343 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnthropological linguisticsMême sujetCategorization, perception, and languageTravaux en français237 207