MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2066712561 · doi:10.4043/23974-ms

Natural Gas Dehydration Using Supersonic Separators with a Novel Design

2013· article· en· W2066712561 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOffshore Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Établissements canadiensHusky Energy (Canada)Memorial University of Newfoundland
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputational fluid dynamicsDiffuser (optics)Supersonic speedNatural gasNozzleMechanical engineeringProcess engineeringVolumetric flow rateCurrent (fluid)Environmental scienceComputer scienceNuclear engineeringEngineeringMechanicsAerospace engineeringWaste managementElectrical engineeringPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Supersonic separators are compact devices capable of separating condensables of gaseous mixtures. Of special interest is the application of these separators in the dew point control of natural gas. Many researchers as well as industry pioneers have invested in the study of these separators in the past two decades and various prototypes as well as field ready models have been introduced. All of these designs are based on the concept of a swirling flow in a supersonic nozzle. The current work was initiated to investigate possible alternate designs. In this paper, preliminary studies of an alternate design of the supersonic separators based on inducing centrifugal separation using a U-shaped diffuser is presented. Computational Fluid Dynamics models were used to simulate the design, predict the flow dynamics of the gaseous mixture, and compare to the conventional swirl type design. A bench scale experiment was set up to verify the CFD models. It was concluded that the CFD technique is a valuable and reliable tool for the study of these separators. Moreover, it was shown that potentially more efficient separation with a higher rate of pressure recovery can be achieved with the proposed design when compared to the conventional designs. Introduction Natural gas is one of the most important sources of energy in the world. At a current rate of over 120 trillion cubic feet per year, it accounts for over 25% of the world's primary energy consumption. Furthermore, in the drive for cleaner fuels, the demand for natural gas is forecast to grow 1 to 3.5% per year for the next 20 years (EIA, 2012). This ever growing demand for natural gas has led to the exploration and development of unconventional reservoirs (e.g. Shale gas, deep water, and the Arctic). However, with these new sources come new challenges, this is particularly true of offshore and harsh environments that limit recovery, storage, and transportation options to bring the gas to market. The key challenge is the limited space on offshore platforms for gas treating. To bring the gas to market, contaminants such as water, carbon dioxide, and sulphur compounds, among others must be removed. However, the bulk of the platform is required for oil recovery, limiting space for the large equipment needed for gas treatment. In addition, energy requirements and waste streams generated in typical gas treatment systems further limit these systems. To bring the gas to market under these conditions requires the development of equipment with a small footprint. Supersonic separators, where removal of contaminants is accomplished through centrifugal forces, do not require chemical solvents and are relatively compact, therefore a more suitable gas conditioning system for offshore. Supersonic separators have been used for selective dew pointing of natural gas with respect to water and/or hydrocarbons (Okimoto et al., 2000; Brouwer et al., 2003; Alfyorov et al., 2005). The supersonic separator is a compact device capable of removing contaminants from natural gas with little loss of thermal energy and/or hydrodynamic head by combining the principles of gas expansion and cyclonic separation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,581
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,905

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle