Notice bibliographique
Résumé
No AccessPerspectives on Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) PopulationsArticle1 Oct 2005Social Networks Approach for Persons With Aphasia Candace Vickers and Darla Hagge Candace Vickers St. Jude Medical CenterFullerton, CA Google Scholar More articles by this author and Darla Hagge St. Jude Medical CenterFullerton, CA Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/cds12.3.6 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Adair-Ewing, S. (1999). Group process, group dynamics, and group techniques with neurogenic communication disorders. In R. Elman (Ed.), Group treatment for neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician's approach (pp. 916). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. Google Scholar ASHA. (in press). Knowledge and skills needed by speech-language pathologists providing services to individuals with cognitive-communication disorders.ASHA Supplement 25. Google Scholar ASHA. (2004). Knowledge and skills needed by speech-language pathologists and audiologists to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate services.ASHA Supplement 24. Google Scholar Angel, J., & Angel, R. (1992). Age at migration, social connections, and well-being among elderly Hispanics.Journal of Aging and Health, 4(4), 480–499. Google Scholar Astrom, M., Asplund, K., & Astrom, T. (1992). Psychosocial function and life satisfaction after stroke.Stroke, 23, 527–531. Google Scholar Avlund, K., Lund, R., Holstein, B., & Due, P. (2004). Social relations as determinant of onset of disability in aging.Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 38, 85–99. Google Scholar Baker, R. (2000). The assessment of functional communication in culturally and linguistically diverse populations. In L. Worrall & C. Frattali (Eds.), Neurogenic communication disorders: A functional approach (pp. 81–100). New York: Thieme.. Google Scholar Battle, D. E. (2000). Becoming a culturally competent clinician.Perspectives on Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations, 6(3), 19–22. AbstractGoogle Scholar Bays, C. (2001). Quality of life of stroke survivors: A research synthesis.Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 33(6), 310–316. Google Scholar Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium.Social Science & Medicine, 51, 843–857. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (2nd ed). Baltimore: Paul Brookes. Google Scholar Blackstone, S. W., & Berg, M. H. (2003). Social networks: A communication inventory for individuals with complex communication needs and their communication partners. Monterey, CA: Augmentative Communication. Google Scholar Blackstone, S., Wilkins, D., Golinker, L., Vickers, C., Hagge, D., Kingsbury, E., et al. (2005). Social networks and individuals with neurological challenges: Measurable and reimbursable differences. Workshop presented to the California Speech-Language Hearing Association 2005 State Convention, Santa Clara, CA. Google Scholar Boles, L. (1998a). Conversational discourse analysis as a method for evaluating progress in aphasia: A case report.Journal of Communicative Disorders, 31(3), 261–274. Google Scholar Boles, L. (1998b). Conducting conversation: A case study using the spouse in aphasia treatment.Special Interest Division 2, Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders Newsletter, 8(3), 24–31. AbstractGoogle Scholar Boles, L. (2000). Solution focused aphasia therapy.CSHA Magazine, 29(39), 8–12. Google Scholar Boles, L. (2003). Counseling the culturally and linguistically diverse elderly and their families.Perspectives on Gerontology, 8(1), 8–9. Google Scholar Centeno, J. (2005). Working with bilingual individuals with aphasia: The case of a Spanish-English bilingual client.Perspectives on Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations, 12(1), 2–6. AbstractGoogle Scholar Chapey, R., Duchan, J., Elman, R., Garcia, L., Kagan, A., Lyon, J., et al. (2000). Life participation approach to aphasia: A statement of values for the future.The ASHA Leader, pp. 4–6. Google Scholar Code, C. (2003). The quantity of life for people with chronic aphasia.Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13(3), 379–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Davidson, B., Worrall, L., & Hickson, L. (2003). Identifying the communication activities of older people with aphasia: Evidence from naturalistic observation.Aphasiology, 17(3), 243–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Evans, R., Connis, R., Bishop, D., Hendricks, R., & Haselkorn, J. (1994). Stroke: Family dilemma.Disability and Rehabilitation, 16(3), 110–118. Google Scholar Garrett, K., & Beukelman, D. (1992). Augmentative communication approaches for persons with severe aphasia. In K. Yorkston (Ed.), Augmentative communication in the medical setting (pp. 245–342). Communication Tucson, AZ: Skill Builders. Google Scholar Glass, T., Mendes De Leon, C., Seeman, T., & Berkman, L. (1997). Beyond single indicators of social networks: A LISREL analysis of social ties among the elderly.Social Science and Medicine, 44(10), 1503–1517. Google Scholar Gottlieb, B.H. (1981). Preventive interventions involving social networks and social support. In B. H. Gottlieb (Ed.), Social networks and social support (pp. 201–229). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person.Brain and Language, 36, 3–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Gudykunst, W. B., & Lee, C. M. (2001). An agenda for studying ethnicity and family communication.The Journal of Family Communication, 1(1), 75–85. Google Scholar Hemsley, G., & Code, C. (1996). Interactions between recovery in aphasia, emotional and psychosocial factors in subjects with aphasia, their significant others and speech language pathologists.Disability and Rehabilitation, 18(11), 567–584. Google Scholar Hilari, K., Byng, S., Lamping, D., & Smith, S. C. (2003). Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39): Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity.Stroke, 34(8), 1944–1950. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Hirsch, B. J. (1981) Social networks and the coping process: creating personal communities. In B. H. Gottlieb (Ed.), Social networks and social support (pp. 149–170). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. London: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar Kagan, A. (1995). Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals.Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2(1), 15–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and resources for training conversation partners.Aphasiology, 12(9), 816–830. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Kagan, A., Black, S. E., Duchan, J. F., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Square, P. (2001). Training volunteers as conversation partners using “Supported conversation for adults with aphasia (SCA): A controlled trial.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 624–638. AbstractGoogle Scholar Kagan, A., & Gailey, G. F. (1993). Functional is not enough: Training conversation partners for aphasic adults. In A. L. Holland & M. M. Forbes (Eds.), Aphasia treatment: World perspectives (pp. 199–225). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group. Google Scholar Kagan, A., Winckel, J., & Shumway, E. (1996a). The pictographic resource manual. Toronto, Canada: The Aphasia Centre-North York. Google Scholar Kagan, A., & Winckel, J., & Shumway, E. (Producers). (1998b). Supported conversation for aphasic adults [videorecording]. I know you know. Toronto: Aphasia Centre-North York. Google Scholar Langdon, H. (2005). Providing speech-language services to older populations: The role of ethnicity and acculturation.Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 15 (1), 21–25. Google Scholar Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4(2), 66–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Litwin, H. (2003). The association of disability, sociodemographic background, and social network type in later life.Journal of Aging and Health, 15(2), 391–408. Google Scholar Liu, X., Liang, J., Muramatsu, N., & Sugisawa, H. (1995). Transitions in functional status and active life expectancy among older people in Japan.Journal of Gerontology, 50B (6), S383–S394. Google Scholar Lock, S., Wilkinson, R., & Bryan, K. (2001). Supporting partners of people with aphasia in relationships and conversation.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 25–30. Google Scholar Lubben, J. E., & Damron-Rodriguez, J. (2003). An international approach to community health care for older adults.Family & Community Health, 26(4), 338–349. Google Scholar Lucker, J., & Molloy, A. (2003). Family-centered services for clients who are elderly.Perspectives on Gerontology, 8(1), 3–7. Google Scholar Lui, M., & Mackenzie, A. (1999). Chinese elderly patients' perceptions of their rehabilitation needs following a stroke.Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(2), 391–400. Google Scholar Lyon, J. (1998) Treating real-life functionality in a couple coping with severe aphasia. In N. Helm-Estabrooks & A. Holland (Eds.), Approaches to the treatment of aphasia (pp. 203–239). San Diego: Singular. Google Scholar Lyon, J. G., Cariski, D., Keisler, L., Rosenbek, J., Levine, R., Kumpula, J., et al. (1997). Communication partners: Enhancing participation in life and communication for adults with aphasia in natural settings.Aphasiology, 11(7), 693–708. Google Scholar Michael, Y., Colditz, G., Coakley, E., & Kawachi, I. (1999). Health behaviors, social networks and healthy aging: Cross sectional evidence from the Nurses' Health Study.Quality of Life Research, 8, 711–722. Google Scholar Morris, D. (1986). The languages of pain. In R. Caplan (Ed.), Exploring the concept of mind (pp. 89–99). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press. Google Scholar Oelschlaeger, M. L. (1999). Participation of a conversation partner in the word searches of a person with aphasia.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8(1), 62–71. LinkGoogle Scholar Parr, S., Byng, S., Gilpin, S., & Ireland, C. (1997). Talking about aphasia: Living with loss of language after stroke. Buckingham, England: Open University Press. Google Scholar Plunkett, A., & Quine, S. (2005). Difficulties experienced by carers from non-English-speaking backgrounds in using health and other support services.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 20(1), 27–32. Google Scholar Pound, C., Parr, S., Lindsay, J., & Woolf, C. (2000). Beyond aphasia: Therapies for living with communication disability. Bicester, Oxon, United Kingdom: Winslow Press. Google Scholar Roberts, P. M. (2001). Aphasia assessment and treatment for bilingual and culturally diverse patients. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 208–232). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Google Scholar Rogers-Dulan, J., & Blacher, J. (1995). African American families, religion, and disability: A conceptual framework.Mental Retardation, 33(4), 226–238. Google Scholar Sarno, M. (1993). Aphasia rehabilitation: psychosocial and ethical considerations.Aphasiology, 7(4), 321–344. Google Scholar M. Sarno & J. Peters (Eds.). (2004). The aphasia handbook. National Aphasia Association. (Adapted and edited by Sarno and Peters from Parr, Pound, Byng, & Long (2003). The stroke and aphasia handbook, Connect Press). Google Scholar Seeman, T. E. (2000). Health promoting effects of friends and family on health outcomes in older adults.American Journal of Health Promotion, 14, 362–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Simic, A. (1993). Aging and ethnic identity.Journal of Case Management, 2(1), 9–13. Google Scholar Simmons-Mackie, N. (2001). Social approaches to aphasia intervention. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed., pp. 246–268). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Google Scholar Simmons-Mackie, N. (1998). A solution to the discharge dilemma in aphasia: Social approaches to aphasia management.Aphasiology, 12, 231–238. Google Scholar Vickers, C. (1998). Communication Recovery: Group conversation activities for adults. San Antonio, TX:. Communication Skill Builders. Google Scholar Vickers, C. (2004). Communicating in groups: one stop on the road to improved participation in life for people with aphasia.Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 14(1), 16–20. Google Scholar Zhang, C., & Bennett, T. (2001). Multicultural views of disability: Implications for early intervention professionals.Infant-Toddler Intervention: The Transdisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 143–154. Google Scholar Zunzunegui, M., Alvarado, B., Ser, T. D., & Otero, A. (2003). Social networks, social integration, and social engagement determine cognitive decline in community-dwelling Spanish older adults.Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B, S93–S100. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 12Issue 3October 2005Pages: 6-14 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Oct 1, 2005 Metrics Downloaded 86 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & Permissions© 2005 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».