The Community College Baccalaureate: Emerging Trends and Policy Issues (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Community College Baccalaureate: Emerging Trends and Policy Issues Thomas W. Bailey (bio) Deborah L. Floyd, Michael L. Skolnik, and Kenneth P. Walker, (Eds.). The Community College Baccalaureate: Emerging Trends and Policy Issues. Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2004. 228 pp. Paper: $29.95. ISBN: 1-57922-130-0. Over the last decade, many community colleges have begun to offer bachelors' degrees. A few stirrings in the 1980s were followed by acceleration in the late 1990s signaled by the founding of the Community College Baccalaureate Association in 1997. The trajectory of the movement in Canada is similar, with perhaps a slightly earlier start. This edited volume has several objectives. It describes the history of this controversial movement in the United States in a chapter by Kenneth Walker, the president and founder of the Community College Baccalaureate Association, and in Canada by Michael Skolnik and another chapter by Berta Vigil Laden. Deborah Floyd provides an overview of the movement and defines various models. Thomas Furlong, John McKee, and Jon and Nancy Remington describe the development and characteristics of the CCB at St. Petersburg College in Florida, Westmark College in Arkansas, and Great Basin College in Nevada. A chapter by Albert Lorenzo describes the university center model in which the university conducts classes on community college campuses but maintains control over the B.A. Barbara Townsend presents a skeptical view of the movement, although other chapters also raise questions. Each chapter ends with a useful list of policy and research questions. In their concluding chapter, Floyd and Skolnik suggest that there are two broad arguments for the CCB. The first is increased access to the B.A. for students with limited B.A. opportunities due to location, finances, or learning styles. This access is particularly important because students are increasingly interested in earning a B.A. since it is more and more important in the labor market. The CCB might also be less expensive for both the student and the taxpayer. Floyd's overview chapter puts particular emphasis on geographic access, arguing that place-bound students should not be blocked from obtaining a B.A. simply because life circumstances prevent them from moving to a location where they could attend a B.A.-granting institution. A second argument for the CCB is that community colleges will provide a different type of post-secondary instruction that combines a more hands-on education with academic study. In addition to this pedagogic issue, the authors also emphasize providing education in fields where traditional four-year colleges are unable or unwilling to provide adequate capacity; nursing and teacher education are prominent examples. The skeptical perspective, presented in Townsend's chapter, but appearing in other chapters as well, suggests that, once they start conferring B.A.'s, community colleges will begin to shift resources away from their traditional access mission, neglecting developmental education and transfer. Or as Skolnik asks, can the college maintain its traditional mission or will the B.A. "unleash forces that will reshape the college in the image of the university" (p. 66). Skeptics also question whether the CCB will be accepted by graduate schools or employers equivalent to a B.A. granted by a traditional baccalaureate college or university. This book does an excellent job of raising the issues and outlining the controversy, but what does it do to resolve the debate? The St. Petersburg case suggests that the college has found a partnership and division of labor between it and the University of Southern Florida that could preserve the distinction between the CCB and the B.A. But overall, evidence presented in the book does suggest that, once community colleges start granting B.A.'s they will begin to take on the characteristics of traditional colleges. Westmark College was founded in 1928 as a two-year college, began offering B.A.'s in 1997, and became the University of Arkansas at Fort Smith in 2002. Unfortunately, the chapter on Westmark does not discuss or comment on this transformation. Lorenzo points out that while community colleges argue for the right to grant "applied" B.A.'s, distinct from academic B.A.'s, many of the CCBs have indeed been in traditional liberal arts...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».