MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2067988203 · doi:10.2523/iptc-11813-ms

Incorporating seismic characterization results into Bul Hanine geological model

2007· article· en· W2067988203 sur OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Desgoutte, Abdulmalik Al Abdulmalik, Mathieu Pellerin, Gael Lecante, Scott Robinson, John S. McCallum

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensConocoPhillips (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesQatar Petroleum
Mots-clésPetrophysicsSeismic inversionReservoir modelingGeologyWell controlInversion (geology)LithologySeismic to simulationEnvironmental geologySeismologyPetrologyPetroleum engineeringDrillingPorosityGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Bul Hanine field is located offshore Qatar with primary oil production from the Reservoir-X carbonates. In 2005 and 2006, Qatar Petroleum recognized that future development of this mature field would require a modern, state of the art, reservoir model, and initiated several projects to achieve that goal: reprocessing and elastic inversion of the 1995 vintage 3D seismic, petrophysical data collection and analysis, and comprehensive reservoir characterization. This paper illustrates how Qatar Petroleum, with contractual assistance from PGS, Total and Beicip-Franlab, has applied advanced reservoir characterization techniques to constrain petrophysical property distribution using elastic inversion products and therein reducing uncertainty in a reservoir model. Following detailed rock typing core and log analysis from approximately 5400 feet of core and from 26 wells, and logs from 90 well penetrations, the team observed that there was considerable heterogeneity in this "hard" well data, and that distribution of the petrophysical properties between wells would suffer in the absence of additional control. To address the lack of inter-well control, an attempt was made to extract reservoir property information from the seismic data. Using optimally reprocessed existing 3D seismic data (to eliminate noise and preserve relative amplitudes) and pre-stack elastic inversion, advanced reservoir characterization techniques yielded volume data including lithology, lithology probability, and porosity that could be used as geo-statistical constraints. Initially, a detailed petro-elastic analysis was performed on select wells to calibrate well-derived elastic properties with seismic data in order to design the most appropriated seismic characterization workflow. The results demonstrated that acoustic and elastic impedances could be used to discriminate Calcites, Dolomites, and Anhydrites. Well analysis also indicated a robust relationship between impedance and porosity and each dominant lithology. Subsequently, a pre-stack inversion was conducted prior to 3D discriminate analysis to produce dominant lithology and associated probability volumes. Following this, seismic reservoir characterization resulted in generation of a lithology based porosity volume. During geo-statistical modeling, dominant lithology probability volumes were used as a co-simulation parameter for generating a lithology model, and the seismic porosity volume was used as co-simulation parameter for porosity distribution, resulting in a high-resolution static model of the Reservoir-X reservoir. This work demonstrates the added value of pre-stack seismic reservoir characterization for modeling of the Reservoir-X carbonate reservoir. In addition to porosity, this technique gives light to lithology changes throughout the reservoir, providing otherwise unobtainable information of rock-type distribution. Introduction Reservoir characterization is typically ground-truthed by well data; however wells are often a great distance from each other and thus provide only limited understanding of the actual lateral heterogeneity of a reservoir. Despite poor vertical resolution, seismic data is among the very few data types that provide lateral resolution in excess of that offer by wells alone. This paper presents a case study detailing the methodology for defining the relationship between seismic data and well petrophysical properties (lithology and porosity) and the subsequent generation of seismic derived constraints for high resolution geological modeling. The target of the reservoir characterization work is the nominally 200 foot thick Reservoir-X formation, a predominately carbonate interval that also contains dolomite and anhydrite layers. The project objectives were to generate seismic volumes that could provide quantitative value in reservoir characterization. Knowledge of the Reservoir-X lithology plays a critical part in identifying reservoir dynamic properties; often differing lithologies have similar porosity but dramatically different permeability. Defining dominant lithology from seismic data would offer significant improvement over a purely well log derived lithology trend. In intervals with homogeneous lithology the ability to define porosity trends enhances well log derived porosity volumes.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,475
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,816

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Petroleum Technology ConferenceMême sujetReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsTravaux en français237 207