MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2068095675 · doi:10.1353/utq.2012.0070

The Travels, 1850 Version (review)

2012· article· en· W2068095675 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Barbara Belyea

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical and Literary Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMemoirQueen (butterfly)NarrativeHistorySection (typography)Art historyPeriod (music)ClassicsArtLiteratureComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Travels, 1850 Version Barbara Belyea (bio) David Thompson. The Travels, 1850 Version. Volume 1 of The Writings of David Thompson, edited by William E. Moreau McGill-Queen’s University Press. 2009. lxiv, 352. $44.95 William Moreau is the third editor of Thompson’s memoirs written between 1846 and 1850, called his Narrative or his Travels. Still in draft form when Thompson died in 1857, the manuscript changed hands [End Page 688] several times before J.B. Tyrrell published it as the Champlain Society volume for 1916; the same text was reissued in 1962, introduced by Richard Glover. Tyrrell’s interest was in Thompson the surveyor and cartographer, Glover’s in Thompson the explorer and company man. Moreau’s edition is the first to provide an account of the manuscript drafts, hence the process of composition. Moreau’s interest is in Thompson the writer. Moreau aims to liberate the text from ‘the overly narrow confines of the North American fur trade’ – to place Thompson’s ‘world of works, both textual and material . . . within more ample horizons.’ Yet Moreau sees Thompson’s apprenticeship to the Hudson’s Bay Company, especially the ‘four inland years’ of 1786–90, as ‘the freshest and most vivid part of the entire work’ and adds, ‘The importance of this period can hardly be overestimated.’ This section, with its annotations and references, can serve as a representative sample of the edited text. Several events define the ‘four inland years’ as a formative period: a grueling trip from York Factory, wintering near the Rocky Mountains, trade along the Saskatchewan River, and Philip Turnor’s lessons in practical astronomy. Moreau’s notes identify the places, flora, fauna, and people mentioned in Thompson’s text. As a rule, Moreau’s annotation is limited to these categories. Some notes are missing, such as the modern name (Nelson River) for the ‘Kis is katchewan River’ east of Lake Winnipeg and the name (Grand Rapids) of ‘a long and heavy fall.’ And some notes miss the point: Thompson’s comment that ‘we had raised a doric building, which might suit a painter of rustic scenery’ elicits an explanation of Greek architecture, not a reference to the picturesque landscapes evoked in contemporary exploration narratives. Thompson’s mention of the current standard of trade could be checked in contemporary company accounts. And his sly remark, ‘When the tents remove, the able men are all a hunting,’ echoes Fidler’s similar comment in 1792. This might be seen as nitpicking. But Moreau’s habit of responding to details rather than building a systematic context indicates the usefulness of his annotations and the reach of his references. Moreau admits that ‘the context [of the Travels] is certainly that of the life of its author, especially his fur trade career.’ ‘Context’ literally means comparison with other documents. For every period of Thompson’s fur-trade life there exist parallel texts – post journals, correspondence, accounts, maps, and reports – which confirm, nuance, or question the assertions and judgments of Thompson’s memoirs. These parallels are never so plentiful as for the ‘four inland years.’ Moreau misses many opportunities to illuminate Thompson’s version of events because he repeatedly fails to cite a large, informative context of fur-trade documents. Like the notes, Moreau’s appendix of biographies reflects ‘ample horizons’ but short-changes [End Page 689] Thompson’s fur-trade colleagues: Turnor’s bio is half the length of Franklin’s; Fidler’s notice omits striking parallels with Thompson’s career; George Hudson and James Gaddy receive no notice at all. Thompson’s early cartography is not reproduced or discussed. Moreau’s coverage of printed sources is also unbalanced: a well-known current edition of Thompson’s own journals and several pertinent historical studies pass unmentioned, while the reader is invited to consider twentieth-century poems and a novel about Thompson’s wife. A shift in interest and emphasis with each edition is inevitable and in many respects desirable. As Moreau points out, ‘[T]he breadth of the Travels is reflected in the many ways in which the work has been approached’ (xiii). Moreau’s attention to the stages of composition and his insistence on a reliable...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,113
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,379

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,015
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1130,067

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,228
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetHistorical and Literary StudiesTravaux en français237 207