Power-Law Averaging for Inference of Effective Permeability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Power law averaging was developed to scale fine grid permeability models to effective permeability models on a coarse grid for flow simulation. Direct calculation of effective permeability with selected boundary conditions replaced the need for heuristic scaling procedures such as power law averaging. New areas of application have emerged for power law averaging. First, successful inversion of well test and production data require techniques to simultaneously account for small scale data, coming from core and log measurements, with large scale data coming from well test and production data. The power law formalism can be used to transform the permeability data coming from different scales so that the transformed permeability averages linearly, which is a requirement of geostatistical techniques. Second, the effective permeability in sandstone/shale systems can be calculated with the volume fraction of shale and the constituent permeability values, provided that the directional averaging exponents can be calibrated to the geological setting. The theory behind power law averaging is revisited and new areas of application are developed. Introduction Power law averaging was developed to upscale fine scale realizations to coarse scale models for flow simulation1,2,3; however, with increases in computing power, upscaling is easily performed with quick flow simulators instead of approximative scaling relations. We will revisit power law averaging and describe possible applications in modern reservoir characterization. Among other things, well log data provide a measure of porosity and the volume fraction of shale. The porosity data can be used directly, but when permeability measurements are sparse, permeability must be based on the combined spatial characteristics of the shale and sandstone. The power law averaging method provides a way to calculate directional permeability values that account for the orientation of the shales. Figure 1 shows schematically how the VSH log data can be transformed to a range of horizontal and vertical permeabilities based on different ωvalues in the power law transformation. Another problem in modern geostatistics is the integration of small-scale core-based permeability with large-scale production data. See Figure 2 for a schematic illustration of the different scales at which data is collected and how they are combined to create multiple realizations at an intermediate scale. The problem is the vast difference in scale and the highly non-linear averaging of permeability. To further complicate this situation, modelling is often performed at an intermediate scale between the core and production data. Gaussian techniques require the data to be transformed to a Gaussian distribution, but permeability does not average linearly after Gaussian transformation; however, a power law transform of permeability provides values that average linearly and permits the data to be simultaneously accounted for in modelling via a direct simulation approach. When unstructured grids are used the data must be linear with scale and power law averaging provides a means to do this. Figure 3 shows an example of an unstructured grid with cells that vary in size. Modern flow simulators are tending towards unstructured grids. Power law transformation will permit direct modelling of different volumes with block kriging.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».