MétaCan
← tous les travaux

A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency

2014· review· en· 3 082 citations· W2068264290 sur OpenAlex· 10.1002/jrsm.1123

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Affiliation canadienneUne personne signataire a déclaré un établissement canadien. C'est la seule voie dont dispose la base habituelle.
Organisme subventionnaire canadienUn organisme canadien l'a financé. Le travail peut ne porter aucune affiliation canadienne.

Résumé

BACKGROUND: The scoping review has become an increasingly popular approach for synthesizing research evidence. It is a relatively new approach for which a universal study definition or definitive procedure has not been established. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of scoping reviews in the literature. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A search was conducted in four bibliographic databases and the gray literature to identify scoping review studies. Review selection and characterization were performed by two independent reviewers using pretested forms. RESULTS: The search identified 344 scoping reviews published from 1999 to October 2012. The reviews varied in terms of purpose, methodology, and detail of reporting. Nearly three-quarter of reviews (74.1%) addressed a health topic. Study completion times varied from 2 weeks to 20 months, and 51% utilized a published methodological framework. Quality assessment of included studies was infrequently performed (22.38%). CONCLUSIONS: Scoping reviews are a relatively new but increasingly common approach for mapping broad topics. Because of variability in their conduct, there is a need for their methodological standardization to ensure the utility and strength of evidence.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

La notice

Revue
Research Synthesis Methods
Thématique
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Domaine
Decision Sciences
Établissements canadiens
University of GuelphPublic Health Agency of Canada
Organismes subventionnaires
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Mots-clés
Consistency (knowledge bases)Computer scienceManagement scienceData scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineering
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui