MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2068431134 · doi:10.2118/01-09-02

The Growth of the Steam Chamber During the Early Period of the UTF Phase B and Hangingstone Phase I Projects

2001· article· en· W2068431134 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Y. Ito, To-ichi HIRATA, M. Ichikawa

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOil sandsSteam-assisted gravity drainageSteam injectionAsphaltGeologySteam drumEnvironmental sciencePetroleum engineeringSuperheated steamMaterials scienceWaste managementBoiler (water heating)EngineeringComposite material

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Based on temperatures measured in observation wells of the UTF Phase B project, the behaviour of the rising steam chamber when it reached impermeable layers was studied using a numerical thermal simulator. Results indicated that steam could rise by detouring the impermeable layers when they exist within the channel sands. The extension of these impermeable layers is generally less than 10 m in diameter. Most of these impermeable layers became permeable after one to one and a half years of heating with steam. When steam reached shaly sands in the upper part of the reservoir, steam rise was terminated. However, in some instances, it rose slowly after one to one and a half years of heating. Steam generally stopped to rise at few metres from the bottom of the point bar sands. However, a significant amount of bitumen could be produced from these sands. In the Hangingstone reservoir, Japan Canada Oil Sands Limited (JACOS) began initial steam circulation in April 1999 and the regular SAGD operation in July 1999. The early oil production volumes were close to our expectations. An extended understanding of the rising mechanism of the steam chamber is achieved by a comparison of the performances obtained in the Hangingstone and UTF reservoirs. Markedly different characteristics between each were detected, which can be caused by the variance in geomechanical behaviour of the tar sands. Introduction The steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process has been successfully tested at the UTF (Underground Test Facility) project initiated in 1988. The project consisted of a small scale test (Phase A) with three pairs of 50 m horizontal wells, a commercial scaledpilot test (Phase B) with three pairs of 500 m horizontal wells, and Phase D where wells were drilled from the surface. The performance of these tests has been reported(1-3). Japan Canada Oil Sands Limited (JACOS) has participated in the UTF project since 1992, and acquired field data. Numerical history matches were conducted for all of these phases. For example, 10,990 grids were used to match the history of all three pairs of the Phase B project. In addition to the history match of well performances, flow resistance of the annulus and tubing, the effect of gas injection, and other aspects were also studied from the data provided. The growth mechanism of the steam chamber, which is presented in this paper, is also included in these topics. The original recovery mechanism of the SAGD process described by Butler(4, 5), is based on energy flow by thermal conduction, and drainage of the heated oil by gravity. Ito and Suzuki(6) proposed the importance of convective heat transfer in the SAGD process via numerical simulation. An equation to calculate oil production rates was developed by Ito et al.(7) through a parametric study, involving a series of numerical simulation runs. A quantitative heating mechanism of the reservoir by conduction and convection was also evaluated(8, 9). The above mechanism is based on the process where it becomes mature and the steam chamber grows sideways.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,066
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,991

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations36
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologyMême sujetEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesTravaux en français237 207