CHARACTERISTICS OF LONG-TERM COMPLIERS TO HOME-BASED RESISTANCE TRAINING IN CARDIAC PATIENTS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that influence long-term compliance to home-based resistance training (RT) in cardiac patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to 518 patients (447M, 71F) who had participated in the Toronto Rehab's RT programme between February, 1994, and February, 2000. Chi-square analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-eight patients returned surveys (316 M, 42 F), 69% of the total sample. The mean follow-up time was 38.7 ± 25.9 months. Of those patients, 178 (160M, 18F) were continuing RT at the time of the survey (patients referred to as compliers), and 180 (156M, 24F) had discontinued RT (dropouts). One hundred and fourteen of the dropouts had continued for a mean of 5.6 ± 6.4 months(late dropouts). The patients in each of these groups differed significantly in some characteristics. Compliers were more likely to have a greater level of support from families/friends (p < 0.005), and from family physicians/cardiologists (p < 0.0005) than the dropouts. Dropouts had a higher percentage of body fat (p < 0.025) than the compliers. The compliers were more likely to have carried out RT both at a fitness club and at home; more of the late dropouts carried out RT at home only (p < 0.005). A greater proportion of the compliers increased the weight lifted and/or repetitions in the home-based phase compared to the late dropouts (p < 0.005). The compliers were also more likely to perform a warm-up prior to RT, as compared to the late dropouts (p < 0.05). Finally, more of the compliers believed that RT had a positive effect on their ability to perform day to day activities (p < 0.005); compared to the late dropouts who did not perceive RT to have this same benefit. The main reasons cited by patients for participation was to improve appearance, improve performance of tasks at home, and enhance self-image and confidence. The reasons given for discontinuing RT included lack of motivation, not enough time, and laziness. Reasons varied depending on gender and time to non-compliance. CONCLUSION: Factors that appear to increase long-term compliance include the following: support from family, friends, and physicians; a lower percentage of body fat; working out both at a fitness club and at home; increasing the weight lifted and/or repetition; warming up; and a perceived benefit from RT on activities of daily living.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».