Reinforced Concrete Pipe Design under Extreme Loading Conditions Using ASCE Standard 15-98 and Beyond
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Saskatoon is a city in central Saskatchewan, Canada, on the South Saskatchewan River. It has a population of approximately 265,000 people. The City's Circle Drive project is a $245 million design build project involving the construction of a bridge over the North Saskatchewan River, several overpasses, and a large land drainage system (LDS) complete with outfall to the Saskatchewan River. The LDS trunk sewers in this project range considerably in size and applied loading with extreme loading conditions that included a 3050 mm diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with covers approaching 16 m and a 2700 mm diameter RCP pipe with covers of 21 m. Based on contractor preference and staging logistics the pipes were designed and installed utilizing open cut methods. The paper provides an overview of the LDS trunk sewer design and construction processes used and provides insight into both the advantages and challenges of direct design when used with very high applied load scenarios. Open cut installations under high covers produce very large external loads on rigid pipes which induce considerable shear and radial tension forces within the pipe wall. The RCP trunk sewers subject to high external loads on this project were designed utilizing the ASCE Standard Practice for Direct Design of Buried Precast Concrete Pipe Using Standard Installations (15-98). Direct design pipe was chosen for this project as it directly considers shear and radial tension within the pipe wall where traditional indirect design methods do not. As the pipes were exposed to open cut embankment conditions as well as additional loads due to large offset embankments; ASCE Type 1 and 2 Standard Installation Direct Design (SIDD) installations were utilized to develop enough soil structure to reduce the bending moment forces and shear in the invert area of the pipe to within acceptable levels. The 2700 mm pipeline required additional reinforcing beyond this as even SIDD Type 1 installations required reinforcing schemes that were not feasible within a standard pipe wall section. The designs were also undertaken during a time when the AASHTO standard for the Standard Installations was under revision and the ASCE Standard of Practice was being revisited to limit the use of self-compacting materials in the middle third area of the pipe bedding. This required the design process to re-visit and incorporate many of the original design concepts for SIDD as published by Frank Heger in the late 1980's. The use of conventional RCP for this project pushed the practical limitations of both the manufacturing and installation process. The paper provides an overview of both as well as initial results of inspections that were carried out after representative loading had developed on the pipe to confirm that the pipe response to applied loads was consistent with the design intent.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».