MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2069036404 · doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000268278.95379.17

Hazardous Course of an End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Catheter in a Premature Infant

2007· letter· en· W2069036404 sur OpenAlexaff
Dana Al‐Nabhani, Sandesh Shivananda, Helen Holtby, Patrick J. McNamara

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnesthesiology · 2007
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAirway Management and Intubation Techniques
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCarbon dioxideHazardous wasteAnesthesiaCatheterWaste managementSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We would like to present a brief report highlighting a potential adverse effect of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in extremely low-birth-weight infants and the need for vigilance in this high-risk population.A male infant born at 25 weeks of gestation, weighing 680 g at birth, was referred for patent ductus arteriosus ligation on day 28 of life. At surgical intervention, he weighed 1,038 g and required approximately 50% inspired oxygen and a mean airway pressure of 9 cm H2O. Reintubation was performed with a size 3.0 endotracheal tube in the operating room because of oxygenation difficulties, and an end-tidal carbon dioxide catheter was inserted. The distal free end of a 19.0-gauge catheter (Becton Dickinson Intracath; Franklin Lakes, NJ) was trimmed by the attending anesthesiologist to a presumed length that would extend just beyond the tip of endotracheal tube tip. The catheter was then introduced through the side port of adapter in the circuit and was connected to the end-tidal carbon dioxide monitor. Surgical intervention proceeded uneventfully. The immediate chest radiograph taken 1 h after surgical intervention was reported as normal. The infant's clinical status deteriorated 9 h postoperatively, with an increased oxygen requirement to 100% and development of respiratory acidosis. He required transition to high-frequency oscillation ventilation at an increased mean airway pressure of 12 cm H2O. A repeat chest radiograph (fig. 1) showed right upper lobe collapse, left lung hyperinflation, and a foreign body extending from the midtracheal region into the right main bronchus, where it coiled back on itself, finally terminating in a branch of the left main bronchus. An ultrasound scan of the neck region confirmed the presence of a foreign body in the trachea that had the appearance of a catheter. All clinical events in the operating room and postoperatively were reviewed, in particular the placement of any nasal or oral tubes and all suctioning episodes. Emergency rigid bronchoscopy was performed at the bedside, and a severed “distal-type” end-tidal carbon dioxide catheter, measuring 12 cm, was extracted. This catheter had been placed by the attending anesthesiologist to monitor carbon dioxide levels, because the routine proximal trace was inadequate. Although there was residual collapse of the right upper lobe, this improved with gentle physiotherapy and modified ventilation strategies. On further examination of the initial postoperative chest radiograph (fig. 2), a foreign body was identified within the endotracheal tube that did not extend beyond the tip.Although neonatal foreign body management has previously been reported,1–3 this is the first report of airway compromise as a result of a migrated end-tidal carbon dioxide catheter. The role of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in neonates is debatable especially when there is hemodynamic instability.4,5 Monitoring of end-tidal carbon dioxide is a standard practice, for general anesthesia requiring endotracheal placement, at our institution. It is routine to insert a catheter into the endotracheal tube if the trace from the proximal catheter is inadequate.The catheter that was used in this patient was a Becton Dickinson Intracath central venous catheter (1.1 mm × 30.5 cm) made of radiopaque Vialon biomaterial with a through-the-needle introducer system with wire stylet. Becton Dickinson Vialon, a unique proprietary biomaterial, has been proven to have a lower incidence of phlebitis and is less susceptible to mechanical distortion compared with Teflon-based catheters when used for intravenous access.6 Because these catheters are not manufactured for very low-birth-weight infants, the introducer system must be removed and the catheter must be cut to an estimated length from the mouth to midsternal region, which should approximate the end of the endotracheal tube. This catheter is then introduced through the side port of adapter in the circuit so that the hub fits snuggly inside the side port hole. It is impossible to be completely certain about causality in this case. We speculate that the catheter may have been only partially cut before insertion, and the whole length of the catheter was then inserted through the endotracheal tube adapter. On postoperative removal, the distal segment became separated completely and was left behind within the endotracheal tube. Routine endotracheal suctioning may then have led to migration of the catheter into the distal airway. It is also possible that the catheter snapped at the junction with the hub upon removal, because this junction is usually considered a weak point. Unfortunately, there is no documentation of the length to which the catheter was trimmed before insertion to decide which mechanism was most likely.This case demonstrates an important complication of distal end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in the very low-birth-weight infant and reemphasizes the dangers of using catheters that were not developed for use in this population. Because there are no custom-made catheters for this population, it does emphasize the need to ensure that if a catheter is cut, the distal end should be accounted for and appropriately disposed of. It particularly stresses the importance of measuring the length to which the catheter is cut before insertion, and the need to remeasure catheter length upon removal. It also emphasizes the need to review all aspects of the x-ray, in particular the status of indwelling tubes and line.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,458
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnesthesiologyMême sujetAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesTravaux en français237 207