MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2069303842 · doi:10.1353/can.2012.0037

Samuel de Champlain before 1604 : Des Sauvages and Other Documents Related to the Period (review)

2012· article· en· W2069303842 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Catherine Desbarats

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGeography and Environmental Studies in Latin America
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueen (butterfly)Period (music)Art historyPower (physics)HistorySAINTHumanitiesArtClassics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Samuel de Champlain before 1604: Des Sauvages and Other Documents Related to the Period Catherine Desbarats Samuel de Champlain before 1604: Des Sauvages and Other Documents Related to the Period. Edited by Conrad E. Heidenreich and K. Janet Ritch. Toronto: The Champlain Society and Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2010. Pp. 490, $75.00 Behind this volume lies a wish to contribute to the 400th-anniversary celebrations surrounding Samuel de Champlain and the founding of Quebec in 1608. Rather than rush to make the party, however, Professors Conrad Heidenreich and K. Janet Ritch lingered over their labour of love, which focuses mainly, in any case, on Champlain’s first voyage to the Saint Lawrence Valley in 1603. Co-published by the Champlain Society and McGill-Queen’s University Press, the result is an erudite, bilingual, critical edition of Champlain’s first book, Des Sauvages, ou Voyage de Samuel Champlain, de Brouage, fait en la France nouvelle, l’an mil six cens trois, and of several other carefully chosen documents, including a previously unknown Spanish-language power of attorney. This work will be of great interest not just to scholars of early Canada, but to those concerned about early modern Atlantic worlds more broadly. Heidenreich and Ritch effectively update volume one of the six-volume Champlain Society edition of the explorer’s works, which appeared between 1922 and 1936. Errors of transcription and translation are here corrected as well as recorded, and two new introductory essays (the first, more biographical and historical, the second more literary and linguistic) crisply contextualize the documents and their new translations. Unlike H.P. Biggar, this editorial team mainly omits the tantalizing ‘Brief discours,’ first published in 1870. Though there is little doubt that Samuel de Champlain travelled to the West Indies and perhaps to Mexico in 1599 under the Spanish flag, as three known extant manuscripts suggest, debates over Champlain’s authorship and penmanship continue. After reviewing the controversy, Heidenreich and Ritch ultimately exclude the overseas portions of the narrative (not to mention its extraordinary illustrations), on the grounds that they do not, in their estimation, ‘relate to Champlain’s later Canadian career’ (xiv). Disrupting national meta-narratives surrounding Champlain as [End Page 493] ‘founder,’ one gets the sense, is not a priority. Neither is the inclusion of visual material. Pre-empted by the book’s periodization (and perhaps by expense), no maps appear among the formally presented documents. This is a mild pity, given Heidenreich’s great expertise in Champlain’s cartography, certainly on display in the editorial essays. The editors are deeply concerned, however, with providing an exhaustive bibliographic apparatus, which in the case of Des sauvages includes an invaluable printing history of its two original editions, not to mention such details as call numbers and descriptions of physical condition. For this painstaking work, scholars of many stripes – historians of colonialism, ethnohistorians, historical geographers, literary scholars, historians of the book to name a few – will indeed be eternally grateful. Rules of transcription are also enunciated in transparent detail, which socio-linguists and historians of language and literature more generally will also applaud. The selection and presentation of textual material beyond Des Sauvages is also judicious. The earliest known documents mentioning Champlain by name, dated 1595 and 1597, are included here, for example. They record his pay as fourrier to Henri iv’s garrison in Brittany during the final stages of France’s religious civil wars. Champlain’s consequential early career, we are reminded, occurred on land, not at sea, as the new, and only recently Catholic, king attempted to regain control over Protestant strongholds. As fourrier, Champlain would have helped plan and survey routes to be taken by Henri and his army, identifying supply locations along the way. In a discussion that historians of science will certainly appreciate, the editors try to reconstruct what prior training in surveying and draftsmanship Champlain may have had. Heidenreich’s colleague in the history of cartography, David Buisseret, has elsewhere reinforced the sense that Champlain’s early stint in the army lodgings’ service was probably crucial to his distinctive mapping techniques, pointing to parallels between maps of Brittany produced by his immediate...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,953
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,094

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0280,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,266 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical ReviewMême sujetGeography and Environmental Studies in Latin AmericaTravaux en français237 207