MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2070354570 · doi:10.1176/pn.41.24.0003

Reflecting on My First Quarter As APA President

2006· article· en· W2070354570 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNursing
ThématiqueNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuarter (Canadian coin)PsychologyPolitical scienceHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article From the PresidentFull AccessReflecting on My First Quarter As APA PresidentPedro Ruiz, M.D.Pedro Ruiz, M.D.Published Online:15 Dec 2006https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.41.24.0003In collaboration with Dr. Steven Sharfstein, our immediate past president, I appointed a task force to design a "disclosure form" to evaluate the nominees for the Task Force on DSM-V, whose charge is to oversee the development of the next edition of DSM. In late June, I held a special teleconference of the Board of Trustees to review the disclosure form developed by the task force, and the Board approved it.That was just the first stage of this vital review process. I then appointed a Board-level task force to screen the DSM-V nominees, led by our secretary-treasurer, Dr. Donna Norris. In an executive session at the October Board meeting, the Trustees reviewed the recommendations of that task force and then voted on the nominees under consideration. Given the importance of DSM-V,I plan to devote an entire column to it as work on the manual gets under way.In July I led the annual presidential retreat for the Board of Trustees, during which several key activities took place. First, our legal counsel, Joann MacBeth, oriented the new Board members about their fiduciary and legal responsibilities with regard to service on the Board and to APA overall.Next, we heard a very informative panel presentation on three topics related to my presidential theme, "Addressing Patient Needs: Access, Parity, and Humane Care." The topic of access was discussed by Dr. Margarita Alegria of Harvard University; parity was discussed by Dr. Howard Goldman of the University of Maryland; and Dr. Suzanne Vogel-Scibilia, president of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), discussed humane care.These three presentations and the discussion that ensued led the Board to approve the creation of two presidential task forces during the Board's meeting that immediately followed the retreat: one on access and one on mental health parity. The parity work group will recommend a comprehensive strategy for achieving parity coverage of treatment for mental illness. The access work group is charged with identifying ways that APA can work to improve patients' access to psychiatric care.Later that day, Board members were given an update on various topics that figure prominently in APA's ability to carry out its mission. Dr. Richard Harding, a past president of APA, gave a progress report on the relationship between APA and its three corporate affiliates: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc., American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education, and American Psychiatric Foundation. Dr. James Nininger, a former speaker of the Assembly, led a discussion on membership recruitment and retention.In response to what we learned of the status quo on these topics and the challenges that lie ahead to ensure APA remains effective in responding to the needs of patients and members, the Board approved the creation of two presidential task forces. Dr. Marcia Goin, also a past president, is chairing the task force on APA and its affiliated organizations, while Dr. Nininger is chairing the task force on membership recruitment and retention.Also at the Board meeting following the retreat, Dr. Vogel-Scibilia talked to trustees about one of my most important presidential goals: how APA can build a stronger and closer collaboration with NAMI. Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), discussed NIDA research activities, now and in the future. At the request of Dr. Volkow, I instructed Beatrice Eld and the council she staffs—Addiction Psychiatry—to begin work with the Office of Communications and Public Affairs on creating an educational campaign on the theme "Addictive Disorders Being Real Mental Illness." The council is now recommending that the Board endorse and fund the campaign.During my presidential year, I plan to build even stronger institutional ties between APA and all three of the federal institutes important to psychiatry: National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute of Mental Health, and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.In the November 17 issue, I reported on the activities at APA's fall component meetings, so I won't go into detail here. Let me just recap by saying that 400 APA members gathered in Washington, D.C., and volunteered their time and expertise to labor intensively on numerous issues and projects on behalf of their fellow APA members,our patients, and our profession.In summary, during my first quarter as your president, I started work on many of the initiatives I promised when I campaigned for office. I am pleased with the results so far and grateful for the support I have received from members of the Board and Assembly, other APA leaders, and you—the APA membership. It has been a pleasure and an honor to serve. ▪ ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,560
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle