Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In German studies as well as in literary and culture studies more generally, a reengagement with and re-exploration of Romanticism and its aesthetic, literary, philosophical, and political heirs is under way. Essay collections including The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy (ed. Dalia Nassar, 2014), Constructions of German Romanticism (ed. Mattias Pirholt, 2011), and The Cambridge Companion to German Romanticism (ed. Nicholas Saul, 2009) are only a few of many recent contributions. Romanticism seems to have rebounded from criticism that it idealizes introversion, promotes disengagement with material reality, and fails to acknowledge social conflict and power relations. The ability of Romantic thought and art to create a meaningful interplay of philosophy and literature arguably remains unparalleled. And, to borrow Richard Eldridge’s phrases, Romanticism represents “the effort to envision human possibilities of the achievement of value” more strongly and self-consciously than Enlightenment thought did before it, and offers a compelling vision of the human as “both a free, noumenal agent and an embodied, natural being” (11, 36), even after the catastrophes of twentieth-century history and the challenges of theory after the linguistic turn. A return to Romanticism need not be a nostalgic attempt to recover a more distant and implicitly better past but rather can offer ways to integrate insights from the most trenchant contemporary thought with a sober reassessment of the virtues and crimes of the desirous, reasonable, finite, striving post-Enlightened subject. These propositions were discussed in depth at the German Studies Association conference in Denver in October 2013, in the course of a seminar titled “Recycling Romanticism.” Participants explored the movement’s permutations from the late eighteenth century to the present. We also considered what it means to “recycle” old ideas, as well as what motivates attempts to mine the present for traces of the past. We investigated the ways in which the conceptual reciprocities and emphasis on the subjective will that marked German Romanticism in particular are compatible with aspects of materialism. Several seminar participants have contributed essays to this issue of Seminar, which represents an extension and deepening of the conference discussions. Ideally, the “symphilosophical” connection between the seminar and this journal issue will encourage continued critical engagement with German Romanticism. Literary scholars have agreed that groups and individuals largely (but not exclusively) concentrated in Jena and Heidelberg produced the main philosophical
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».