MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2070511400 · doi:10.1353/mdr.0.0144

Signatures of the Past: Cultural Memory in Contemporary Anglophone North American Drama (review)

2010· article· en· W2070511400 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Drago Momcilovic

Notice bibliographique

RevueModern Drama · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheatre and Performance Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDramaCultural memoryPoliticsHistoryCultural studiesMedia studiesSociologyLiteratureArtAnthropologyPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Signatures of the Past: Cultural Memory in Contemporary Anglophone North American Drama Drago Momcilovic Marc Maufort and Caroline De Wagter, eds. Signatures of the Past: Cultural Memory in Contemporary Anglophone North American Drama. Dramaturgies No. 24: Texts, Cultures and Performances. Brussels: Peter Lang, 2008. Pp. 314. $54.95 (Pb). Marc Maufort and Caroline De Wagter's recent edited collection of essays, Signatures of the Past: Cultural Memory in Contemporary Anglophone North American Drama, reinvigorates many of the familiar debates within memory studies about how playwrights, producers, audiences, companies, and theatre districts throughout North America engage the past and bring it to bear on the social, artistic, and political concerns of the present and future. Coming to us as part of a larger series entitled "Dramaturgies: Texts, Cultures and Performances," this anthology fulfils the promise of providing a showcase for scholars who actively explore the tensions and interfaces between critical theory, textual analysis, cultural studies, and production history. In addition, the collection relies heavily on comparative methods of analysis, often times juxtaposing Canadian and American engagements with cultural memory in order to illustrate the full and diverse range of experiences and concerns relating to the ongoing [End Page 126] negotiation of "diasporic identities, exilic predicaments, and multiethnic subject positions" within North American anglophone drama (11–12). Despite its ambitious scope, the anthology coheres thematically around an enduring, if somewhat over-familiar, set of critical and artistic anxieties about the way cultures access, deploy, share, and reshape the past, as well as the ends to which those memory-acts are put. In addition, the essays strike a collective methodological chord in their attempt to establish the continuing relevance of these debates and the ways they inform and intersect with the dramaturgies of both widely prolific and less visible playwrights in Canada and the United States. In fact, the editors are to be applauded for assembling a wide range of critical meditations – including close readings, production histories, and even a pairing of creative pieces that speak to the power and ethics of writing and to the performance of both self and persona through writing – under the common preoccupation of performance and the constitutive role it plays in the construction of cultural memory in American and Canadian cultural identity and policy. It is clear from the outset that the anthology follows many of the interpretive manoeuvres of more prototypical inquiries into cultural memory. The essays themselves are more or less deeply indebted to and remain squarely within the domain of Pierre Nora's now canonical formulation of the "site of memory": the place, idea, or material object that offers a symbolic (re)construction of a shared national past. The contributors also appear in their own ways to reaffirm long-standing models of cultural memory that have already been brought to us by theorists like Marita Sturken, whose 1997 study Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS Epidemic, and the Politics of Remembering shifts individual and cultural remembrance from being a static offering to being an act of narration and a moment of cultural production – a model that makes us acutely aware of the unfinished and contentious nature of the record thus produced. Yet, despite this familiar line of questioning, Maufort and De Wagter assemble a collection of work that not only appropriates but also juxtaposes the concerns raised by Nora and Sturken and investigate the way this critical dialogue can be transposed within the theatre: a publicly consumed site of memory and, indeed, of memory entanglement that is uniquely spatial. In fact, some of the more valuable insights in this collection emerge in the discussions of the aesthetic particularity of the theatre and the extent to which cultural memories of different kinds – official and marginalized, documented and imagined, commensurate and incommensurate – can be enacted and embodied. Sheila Rabillard, in particular, draws heavily from Peggy Phelan's characterization of the theatre as a space in which loss is continually and inevitably enacted and brings that notion of theatre to bear on the intertwining functions of remembrance and [End Page 127] forgetting so fundamental to any postmodern view of cultural memory. Rabillard's essay, of course, is just one in a long sequence of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueModern DramaMême sujetTheatre and Performance StudiesTravaux en français237 207