Computational models that predict response to HIV therapy can reduce virological failure and therapy costs in resource‐limited settings
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The results of genotypic HIV drug‐resistance testing are, typically, 60–65% predictive of response to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) and have proven valuable for guiding treatment changes. However, genotyping is not available in many resource‐limited settings (RLS). The purpose of this study was to develop computational models that can predict response to ART without a genotype and evaluate their potential as a treatment support tool in RLS. Random forest models were trained to predict the probability of response to ART (<400 copies HIV RNA/ml) using the following data from 14,891 cases of ART change following virological failure in well‐resourced countries: viral load and CD4 count prior to treatment change, treatment history, drugs in the new regimen, time to follow‐up and follow‐up viral load. The models were assessed during cross‐validation, with an independent set of 800 cases, with 231 cases from RLS in Southern Africa, 206 from India and 375 from Romania. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was the main outcome measure of the accuracy of the model's predictions. The models were used to identify alternative regimens for those cases where the salvage regimen initiated in the clinic failed. Finally, annual therapy costs were used to determine the potential cost effectiveness of this strategy for the Indian cases. The models achieved an AUC of 0.74–0.81 during cross validation and 0.76–0.77 with the 800 test TCEs. They achieved an AUC of 0.59–0.65 with cases from Southern Africa, 0.64 for India and 0.73 for Romania. The models identified alternative, locally available drug regimens that were predicted to result in virological response for 97% of cases where the salvage regimen failed in Southern Africa, 98% of those in Romania and 100% in India. Cost‐neutral or cost‐saving regimens that were predicted to be effective were identified for 88% of the Indian salvage failures with a mean saving of $638 per year. We developed computational models that predict virological response to ART without a genotype with comparable accuracy to genotyping with rules‐based interpretation. The models were able to identify alternative regimens that were predicted to be effective for the great majority of cases where the new regimen prescribed in the clinic failed. The models were also able to identify cost‐saving alternatives for most cases of failure in India. These models are now freely available over the internet as part of the HIV Treatment Response Predictions System (HIV‐TRePS), which has the potential to help optimise antiretroviral therapy in countries with limited resources where genotyping is not generally available.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».