MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2071671468 · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31825f29be

Does the ACC Have Potential as an Index of Early Speech Discrimination Ability? A Preliminary Study in 4-Month-Old Infants With Normal Hearing

2012· article· en· W2071671468 sur OpenAlexafffund
Susan A. Small, Janet F. Werker

Notice bibliographique

RevueEar and Hearing · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueNeuroscience and Music Perception
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésAudiologyHindiPsychologyStimulus (psychology)Negativity effectConsonantDevelopmental psychologyMedicineSpeech recognitionCognitive psychologyLinguisticsVowel

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The acoustic change complex (ACC), an auditory evoked potential (AEP) comprises overlapping slow cortical responses, which reflects discrimination capacity in the absence of attention, has not yet been recorded in infants. Because the ACC is a large response, it may be useful as an index of discrimination for infants at both the individual and group level. This is an advantage compared with mismatch negativity, another AEP that reflects discrimination of a change in stimulus, because mismatch negativity is based on difference waves and is most sensitive to group effects. The two objectives of this study were to determine whether: (1) the ACC can be elicited to a change in the English consonants /da/ and /ba/ in young infants and adults whose native language is English, and (2) the ACC can also be elicited to changes in Hindi consonant contrasts reflecting the predicted patterns of discrimination for young infants reported in previous studies. DESIGN: Participants were six adults and twenty-five 4-month-old infants whose native language was English, and were at low risk for hearing loss. Stimuli were concatenated consonant pairs comprised from a dental /da/, plus either /ba/, Hindi retroflex /Da/, a second /da/ or a silent period (i.e., /dada/, /daba/, /daDa/ and /da_/). It was predicted that adults would show the largest ACC to /daba/, similar responses to /dada/ and /daDa/, and no ACC to /da_/, whereas, it was predicted that infants would show a similar ACC to /daba/ and /daDa/, a smaller ACC to /dada/ and no ACC to /da_/. The stimuli were a total of 564 msec in duration and were presented at 86 dB peak SPL with an interstimulus interval of 2200 msec. At least 100 accepted trials for each participant were required in the final waveform to be included in the study. Individual peak amplitudes and latencies were measured for the P1, N1, P2, and N2 components of the response to the initial /da/ and the ACC. Grand mean waveforms were averaged for each stimulus condition. RESULTS: ACCs were elicited in adults to /dada/, /daba/, and /daDa/ with a trend toward a larger grand mean ACC for /daba/ compared with the other stimulus conditions. For infants, cortical responses to /da_/ resembled the adult P1-N1-P2 complex in morphology but had much longer latencies; /daba/ was the only stimulus that consistently elicited ACCs in infants. The ACC to /daba/ had a more distinct and less variable morphology compared with both /dada/ and /daDa/, which might reflect that the infants detected a greater change from /da/ to /ba/ than from /da/ to either /da/ or /Da/. It may also be the case that the ACC could not be detected for these other stimuli because the stimulus duration and interstimulus intervals used in this study were not optimal for eliciting ACCs for a range of stimuli. The pattern of speech discrimination, as reflected by the ACC, only loosely parallels the behavioral discrimination patterns reported in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings show that it is possible to record an ACC in young infants and provide a starting point for further investigation of the infant ACC and its utility as an index of discrimination.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,162
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,383

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,304
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations47
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEar and HearingMême sujetNeuroscience and Music PerceptionTravaux en français237 207