Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Liberal Parliamentarians have joined forces with pharmacists, physicians and the pharmaceutical industry to call for political action to address the ongoing prescription-drug shortage — including a parliamentary inquiry to examine the problem and propose solutions. Liberal Health Critic Dr. Hedy Fry and some Liberal colleagues from the House of Commons and Senate hosted a roundtable in Ottawa on November 24, 2011 — bringing together representatives from the Canadian Pharmacists Association (CPhA), the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) and other health organizations, as well as from the brand-name and generic drug industries. The shortages have been an issue in Canada for the past couple of years, and are affecting a range of pharmaceuticals — from antibiotics and common therapies for heart disease to cancer drugs. The federal government isn't taking the issue seriously enough, says Dr. Fry. “Our government has done absolutely nothing about these drug shortages. As a physician, I am very concerned; this is fundamentally an issue of patient care. What are people with chronic diseases or those undergoing chemotherapy supposed to do when the drugs they need aren't available?” The US administration and legislators have been far more proactive, she says, noting that Congress held hearings on the issue and that the President asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to take steps to fast-track approval of substitute drugs or new drugs, or new processes for manufacturing. The Liberal-led roundtable produced 3 main recommendations, one of which was a call for the House of Commons health committee to conduct a public inquiry. CPhA agrees this is needed, says Jeff Morrison, director of government relations and public affairs for the association. “We think this would be a good opportunity to get all the stakeholders at the table in a transparent forum, being accountable for the shortage situation.” Another recommendation is for the government to raise the issue at the World Health Organization, given that the shortages are a global phenomenon. “We are also asking the government to help fund a third-party organization to monitor drugs on an ongoing basis, to identify where shortages might occur and the causes,” says Dr. Fry. “While warnings about shortages are good and help pharmacists and other health professionals to plan, these are just temporary steps. We need longer-term solutions.” CPhA agrees it would be helpful to have the government provide at least some of the funding for monitoring and for advice on possible substitute drugs. Meanwhile, a short-term solution for sharing information on pending drug shortages has been developed, explains Mr. Morrison. The brand name and generic drug associations will be posting alerts on shortages through websites out of Saskatchewan and Quebec. The website addresses are: http://druginfo.usask.ca/healthcare_professional/canadian_drug_shortages.php and www.vendredipm.ca. (An English version of the latter site, www.fridaypm.ca, is also planned.) For the longer term, CPhA is working with other stakeholders to develop recommendations on potential Health Canada regulatory changes that would speed up approvals of drugs and manufacturing process changes, to help address some of the root causes of shortages.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,038 | 0,067 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,014 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,018 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,079 | 0,061 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,064 | 0,022 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».