Retention of Key Employees in the Oilfield Service Sector
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Prior to 1994 Core Laboratories offered its employees little in the way of company benefits. The company moved from being part of a multinational to an independently owned organization in 1994. At this time, there was recognition that if the newly created company was to be successful in a competitive environment then retention of its key employees was essential. A series of concrete measures were introduced in October 1994. This included health, long term disability and dental benefits and a profit share component to all employees. In addition, for key employees, discretionary bonuses for non-management employees, management incentive plans and stock options were introduced. This paper discusses the benefit and incentive plans, its cost and the impact it has had on the company's employees. Introduction Core Laboratories (Core) was formed in 1936 in Dallas Texas. In 1949, the company created its first international office-in Edmonton, Canada. During the next five decades the company expanded its overseas locations and now operates in more than 50 countries and has over 100 facilities worldwide. In 1984, the company was purchased by a multinational organization. Ten years later, in 1994, a management buy out of the company took place. In September 1995, the company became publicly traded. Prior to 1994, the company adopted local country benefit plans as stipulated by the Government of the day. The company at this time viewed the lack of or minimal benefits plan as a cost saving venture. The parent company did not take into account the affect on morale, employee retention and loyalty that these limited plans provided. The change of ownership in 1994 presented the opportunity for Core to re-assess its benefits package and introduce an incentive plan for its worldwide employees. Benefits In some countries of the world, health and dental services are provided free of charge while others provide limited or no benefits to its employees. It was these latter categories that Core wished to address. The benefits introduced to Core's worldwide employees were based upon modified Canadian and United States plans. Basic health care and hospital accommodations for the employee and dependents were introduced to all regions. This was compulsory for all employees. Core and the employee share the cost. Additional extended health care was introduced, on a voluntary basis, to cover items such as home nursing care, physiotherapy, etc. Both employer and employee again share the cost. Dental coverage was introduced at the same time and covers basic and major dentistry as well as preventative treatment. Two compulsory insurance plans were implemented. The first is life insurance, with all premiums paid by the employer. A voluntary life insurance is offered for further coverage for the employee and dependents. The second, a split cost between employer and employee is the long-term disability insurance. In the event of disability, 60﹪ of an individual's base salary is paid until they either return to employment or reach retirement age. The short-term disabilityis covered by internal procedures and is dependent upon length of service.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».