Where Have the Old Words Got Me?: Explications of Dylan Thomas's Collected Poems (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Where Have the Old Words Got Me? Explications of Dylan Thomas’s Collected Poems Paul Bidwell (bio) Ralph Maud. Where Have the Old Words Got Me? Explications of Dylan Thomas’s Collected Poems McGill-Queen’s University Press. xix, 296. $60.00, $27.95 Ralph Maud's recent collection of explications for each of the ninety-three poems in Dylan Thomas's Collected Poems 1934-1953 completes a project begun four decades earlier with his Entrances to Dylan Thomas' Poetry (1963). The first volume, as Maud explains, was a 'trial by metaphor,' an early attempt to clarify the poems only a decade after the poet's death when little was known about the connections between the work and the life of the precocious poet who burst pyrotechnically upon the London literary scene at the age of nineteen. Now, in Where Have the Old Words Got Me?, Maud explains that 'it has always been biography that has led me to the doorway of a poem.' With the 1985 publication of Paul Ferris's The Collected Letters of Dylan Thomas, the door had swung open to allow for Maud's biographical explications. It is curious, therefore, though perhaps understandable, that they are here offered alphabetically rather than in the sequence of Maud and Walford Davies's 1988 edition of the Collected Poems. Maud defends his alphabetical presentation in the present study with the explanation that Thomas himself had blurred the whole notion of chronology by going back to his notebooks and revising poems published earlier. Yeats and Auden, of course, did the same thing, yet their collected poems are still profitably, if imperfectly, explored by reference to their original sequence of composition. That quibble aside, it must be acknowledged that Maud often provides a useful historical context for the discussion of particular poems, as when he notes that Thomas wrote no poetry that we know of from July 1941 until April 1944, only reviving his imaginative output with the prospect of peace after D-Day (6 June 1944) by writing 'his great poem of peace,' 'Fern Hill.' The strength and perhaps the shortcomings of Maud's decision to deal separately with each poem can best be appreciated by pointing to one example. The early and audacious (some would say sacrilegious) 'Before I knocked' had been given only occasional notice in Entrances but here [End Page 574] receives extended and discrete attention. One welcomes Maud's concentrated and largely successful attempt to clarify the poem's 'basic meaning' (what Thomas himself called the 'poem's hypothesis'), while at the same time wishing for the contextual advantages of Entrances, where Maud had woven references to the poem into a broader discussion of the complex imagery in other 'Process Poems' such as 'The force that through the green fuse drives the flower,' 'A process in the weather of the heart,' and 'Especially when the October wind.' Yet without doubt this new volume gives us much more to chew on as we prepare to digest the multiple meanings straining to emerge from any of Thomas's poems. Maud's technique is to provide a working 'rephrasement' of each poem with his own bracketed interpolations so that one gets a clear sense of the clear sense he finds in the poem. Acknowledging that 'one grits one's teeth as though on a roundabout, holding on as meanings of lesser purchase are thrown off by centrifugal force,' Maud sometimes desperately clings, with what he describes as 'varying degrees of hesitancy and bravado,' to the central meaning, settling for readings that dismiss inconvenient complications. This is a work by an especially sensitive and sensible reader who understands from a lifetime of attention to Thomas's poetry that any explication must have its limitations. Those of us who have depended upon Maud's earlier critical and editorial contributions to Thomas's poetry will be grateful for the wealth of useful information in his latest contribution. Thomas's 'old words' have here received expert attention. Paul Bidwell Paul Bidwell, Department of English, University of Saskatchewan Copyright © 2005 University of Toronto Press Incorporated
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».