Master and Servant: Love and Labour in the English Industrial Age (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Master and Servant: Love and Labour in the English Industrial Age Leonard D. Schwarz (bio) Carolyn Steedman. Master and Servant: Love and Labour in the English Industrial Age. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. xi+263pp. US$32.99 (pb). ISBN 978-0-521-69773-6. In 1785, Phoebe Beatson, aged nineteen, entered the service of Rev. John Murgatroyd, a retired Anglican curate, who had practised all his life around Halifax, peacefully manning the ramparts of a woefully under-resourced Church of England seeking to maintain its position against a rising tide of Methodists and nonconformists. In 1802, Phoebe gave birth to an illegitimate child, Eliza. The father was George Thorp, about whom nothing is known, and who, for reasons [End Page 468] equally unknown, refused to marry Phoebe. Rev. Murgatroyd kept Phoebe in his service, and she and the baby continued to live in his house, by Slaithwaite, a village near Huddersfield. He died in 1806, leaving almost half his property to Phoebe and her child, £150 for Phoebe and an equal amount in trust for Eliza. His watch and much of his furniture went to Phoebe; a globe went to Eliza. Three months later Phoebe married John Sykes, from Huddersfield, leaving a mark, not a signature, in the register. That is all we know about Phoebe. She was aged 36 when she had a child, about ten years later than the average for a first child, legitimate or not. She was 42 when she married. We know rather more about Murgatroyd: born in 1719, he was in 1785 a sixty-six-year-old retired curate and schoolmaster, and still acted as a peripatetic preacher for the churches within a twenty-mile radius of his home. He kept voluminous diaries, which were mostly about his devotions, routines, and studies. Eliza and her mother’s non-routine behaviour are hardly mentioned in his diaries. Phoebe could not write herself. Out of this Carolyn Steedman has managed to write a 263-page book; the prospect might have defeated lesser talents. This book is published by Cambridge University Press, which alone speaks for a certain level of success. Conceptually the book is highly original, and the literary and historical ambitions are far-reaching. The question is, does it succeed? Such unpromising material might be handled at various levels. One way is to hang a narrative of domestic service upon it. As a servant (albeit not as a mother) Phoebe was in quite a typical situation— the single servant looking after the elderly single man, in this case childless and widowed. As an unmarried mother of an illegitimate child, let alone as a mother who continued her living-in domestic service, Phoebe was anything but typical. John Murgatroyd was not originally intended to be a subject of this book, but he has his chapters, notably chapter 5 on “Working for a Living” (as a clergyman) and chapter 6 on “Teaching,” where what Murgatroyd would have taught, and the books he would have taught from—books on the whole as pedantic and tedious as would be expected in eighteenth-century classrooms—are discussed in some detail. Steedman is about to publish a larger book on domestic service in the eighteenth century (A Society of Servants: Domestic Service and the Making of Modern England ) and has published various articles on the subject. Chapter 4 of this book deals with servants’ work, contracts, and settlement. Chapter 7, “Relations,” is partly about contracts and partly about employers’ attempts to get their servants to behave as good servants should—an uphill struggle traditionally carried out by brute force or by books of instructions such as Eliza Haywood’s popular [End Page 469] and constantly republished A Present for a Servant-Maid; Or, the Sure Means of Gaining Love and Esteem. By the late eighteenth century, there were occasional efforts to achieve these results by seeking to explain to servants how an employer would actually feel about a servant dressing too like her mistress, behaving to the children in a certain way, and such-like misdemeanours, a process explained in this chapter. Those readers already acquainted with Steedman’s style—inserting herself into the narrative—will be...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».