MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2073079322 · doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000216385.52857.87

Transient neuropathy after needle-free injection outside of recommended sites

2006· letter· en· W2073079322 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAIDS · 2006
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Établissements canadiensAIDS Vancouver
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnfuvirtideMedicineSurgeryAnesthesiaInjection siteErythemaSubcutaneous injectionInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Biojector B2000 gas-powered needle-free injection system (Bioject Inc., Tualatin, Oregon, USA) is undergoing evaluation for the subcutaneous administration of enfuvirtide (Fuzeon; Roche, Hoffaman-LaRoche, Basel, Switzerland) in HIV-infected, treatment-experienced patients [1]. An unexpected complication has been observed in three male patients receiving standard doses of enfuvirtide twice a day by subcutaneous injection with the Biojector. Patient 1 started enfuvirtide on 3 December 2004, but experienced significant problems with nodules and needle phobia. On 10 December 2004, he was instructed in the use of the Biojector and started using it for enfuvirtide administration. His initial experience using the device was good, with only mild injection-site reactions (tenderness and swelling). However, on 10 May 2005, he felt an immediate sensation of ‘electric shock’ in the right upper lateral thigh after administering enfuvirtide in his right buttock, followed by numbness in the same area of the thigh, which persisted for 3 months then resolved without sequelae. After being instructed to avoid joint regions for injection, he has continued to inject enfuvirtide using the Biojector for a total of 8 months without further symptoms. Patient 2 began enfuvirtide in May 2004 but had significant local symptoms of swelling, soreness, and persistent nodules, resulting in limited areas available for injection. On 18 January 2005, he was instructed in the use of the Biojector and started using it for his regular enfuvirtide injections. He experienced a decrease in the number and severity of injection-site reactions thereafter. On 16 April 2005, he injected enfuvirtide using the Biojector to his medial left upper arm just above the elbow. He had an immediate ‘electric shock’ sensation in the forearm, followed by pain and numbness in the region of the left elbow, including the proximal forearm. The pain resolved in 3 weeks and the numbness after 3 months, both without sequelae. After being instructed to avoid injecting in areas near joints, he has continued to use the Biojector for a total of 7 months without further problems. Patient 3 started enfuvirtide in April 2004. After experiencing ongoing problems with injection-site reactions, on 10 January 2005, he was trained in the use of the Biojector and started using it for enfuvirtide administration. Initially, he experienced mild pain, slight redness, and occasional itching after the injections. On 17 February 2005, he injected enfuvirtide using the Biojector at the top of his left anterior thigh just below the inguinal region. He experienced immediate and severe pain from the injection site down to the top of the left knee. Minutes later, he had a feeling of numbness and altered sensation in the same area. He also found the leg painful to move, making walking difficult. The pain resolved after several days, whereas the numbness and dysesthesia persisted, gradually resolving over the next 6 months. He immediately resumed using standard needles and syringes to administer enfuvirtide and elected not to use the Biojector again. A number of factors may have contributed to the symptoms described after enfuvirtide injection using the Biojector (Table 1). First, all of these men had advanced HIV disease and several years of antiretroviral experience, resulting in significant subcutaneous fat wasting and a low body mass index. This may be exacerbated by injections given close to joints, resulting in the nerves in these areas being particularly close to the surface. Of note is the fact that the injection sites the patients used in these cases were not those recommended by the manufacturer of the device. Recommended subcutaneous injection sites for the Biojector are the same as those for standard needles and syringes: the lateral and posterior aspects of the upper arm, the lateral and anterior aspects of the thigh, the upper back, and abdomen [2].Table 1: Characteristics of patients at the time of the event.The occurrence of immediate pain along a nerve distribution, and numbness and other local neurological symptoms after an injection has not previously been described with the use of needle-free injection systems such as the Biojector. In the cases we have seen thus far, the symptoms have been temporary, resolving over 3–6 months. Patients with advanced HIV disease and generalized fat wasting, who are also those most likely to receive enfuvirtide as part of their antiretroviral regimen, may be at the greatest risk of this complication. Fortunately, this seems to be a relatively uncommon occurrence: we observed three episodes in a 6-month period during which more than 20 patients from our clinic were using the Biojector for twice daily enfuvirtide administration, i.e. three events in approximately 7200 Biojector injections for an approximate incidence of 1: 2400. This complication may be avoided if patients are instructed to inject with the Biojector in the recommended areas, away from joints and other areas where nerves are relatively superficial.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,306
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,228
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle