Host Factors and Childhood Injury: The Influence of Hyperactivity and Aggression
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association between hyperactivity, aggression, and unintentional childhood injury among a cohort of children aged 5-12 years. Participants were recruited utilizing a two-tier randomization process from primary schools in Brisbane, the capital city of Queensland, Australia. Information on hyperactivity and aggression was collected by trained interviewers using a semi structured questionnaire and episodes of injury were reported by parents using an injury event report form. Eight hundred and seventy-one children were recruited into the study of which 811 (93%) completed the full 12 months of follow-up. All subsequent analysis was limited to the children who were retained for the full study period. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one children were categorized as hyperactive and 48 as aggressive. Boys were nearly twice as likely as girls to be categorized as hyperactive or aggressive, although this difference was not statistically significant for aggression. Lower socioeconomic status (SES) as measured by household income was also associated with aggression while more children from middle SES households as measured by both household income and maternal education were hyperactive compared with children from either low or high SES households. RESULTS: After adjusting for key confounding factors, children with high hyperactivity scores had an increased risk of all injuries (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.48-2.64) and medically treated injuries (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.01-2.43). Male gender was also a significant predictor of injury. Initiatives to prevent childhood injuries should take into account that child temperament may act as a mediating factor in the injury pathway. CONCLUSION: Further research is necessary to determine the success of preventive efforts in higher risk children who may react to their environment in a substantially different manner compared with less hyperactive children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».