Structured clinical case PowerPoint™ presentations for distributed learning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Context and setting Clinical case presentations were introduced as a core component of the paediatrics rotation. Presentations took place in a multimedia conference room on the medical school campus. Bridgit™ conferencing software allowed students at other sites to participate in the presentations in real time. The presented cases offered an opportunity to ensure the objectives of the rotation were met, allowed students in smaller centres to be involved with larger groups and provided potentially more variation in case content. Presentations were subsequently edited by faculty staff and students and posted on the university intranet (Dalmedix) for asynchronous learning. Why the idea was necessary Students are exposed to unique patients and conditions, including disorders that are seasonal. The structured clinical cases offered an opportunity to ensure a variety of diagnoses were covered. Students in smaller centres can be actively involved with larger groups and offer variation in case content. The posted cases also represented a valuable resource for students in all years who are preparing for elective work in paediatrics, clinical rotations and examinations. What was done At the end of the paediatrics rotation, student pairs presented a patient who met Year 3 paediatrics curriculum objectives. Templates for PowerPoint™ presentations were provided in order to maintain consistency in case style. Presentations were required to be 10 minutes in duration, visual, interactive, to include question and answer sessions, a basic science slide and a multiple-choice question with relevance to the case. Paper copies of the cases were distributed to faculty for checking of content. These were then edited by elective students, who subsequently posted them on Dalmedix. Students were asked to complete questionnaires regarding their learning experience, with 9 items to be answered on a Likert scale of 1–5 (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) and 2 open-ended questions. Currently, more questionnaire data are being collected. A total of 65 PowerPoint™ case presentations have been posted on the Dalhousie intranet, available to medical students for learning. Evaluation of results and impact Over the past 3 years, 328 students have participated. One clerk was unable to obtain consent to make a presentation from the patient and family. Case-based PowerPoint™ presentations shared using Bridgit™ conferencing software have been an invaluable learning tool for medical students. Pilot questionnaires administered in 2004−05 and 2005−06 have indicated that 87% of clerks found creating and presenting a case presentation a useful learning experience. In addition, 85% of students thought cases available on the university's intranet would be a useful learning tool and 83% of clerks found it useful to watch other groups present (mean Likert score 4·2 ± 0·6). The clerks identified 3 main strengths in the case presentation learning process: learning about specific cases; practising presentations, and patient contact. Students found writing a multiple-choice question the most challenging aspect of the presentation (mean Likert score 3·9 ± 0·8). Due to the success of the case-based presentation learning component in paediatrics, a similar format has been launched in obstetrics and gynaecology. Discussion about involving an overseas medical school is underway and the cases are to be implemented as a distributed education component in a new medical school.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,025 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,350 | 0,127 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».