Site-Level Variance for Adverse Tracheal Intubation–Associated Events Across 15 North American PICUs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: Tracheal intubation in PICUs is associated with adverse tracheal intubation-associated events. Patient, provider, and practice factors have been associated with tracheal intubation-associated events; however, site-level variance and the association of site-level characteristics on tracheal intubation-associated event outcomes are unknown. We hypothesize that site-level variance exists in the prevalence of tracheal intubation-associated events and that site characteristics may affect outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Fifteen PICUs in North America. SUBJECTS: Critically ill pediatric patients requiring tracheal intubation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Tracheal intubation quality improvement data were collected in 15 PICUs from July 2010 to December 2011 using a National Emergency Airway Registry for Children with robust site-specific compliance. Tracheal intubation-associated events and severe tracheal intubation-associated events were explicitly defined a priori. We analyzed the association of site-level variance with tracheal intubation-associated events using univariate analysis and adjusted for previously identified patient- and provider-level risk factors. Analysis of 1,720 consecutive intubations revealed an overall prevalence of 20% tracheal intubation-associated events and 6.5% severe tracheal intubation-associated events, with considerable site variability ranging from 0% to 44% tracheal intubation-associated events and from 0% to 20% severe tracheal intubation-associated events. Larger PICU size (> 26 beds) was associated with fewer tracheal intubation-associated events (18% vs 23%, p = 0.006), but the presence of a fellowship program was not (20% vs 18%, p = 0.58). After adjusting for patient and provider characteristics, both PICU size and fellowship presence were not associated with tracheal intubation-associated events (p = 0.44 and p = 0.18, respectively). Presence of mixed ICU with cardiac surgery was independently associated with a higher prevalence of tracheal intubation-associated events (25% vs 15%; p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.29-2.53; p = 0.01). Substantial site-level variance was observed in medication use, which was not explained by patient characteristic differences. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial site-level variance exists in tracheal intubation practice, tracheal intubation-associated events, and severe tracheal intubation-associated events. Neither PICU size nor fellowship training program explained site-level variance. Interventions to reduce tracheal intubation-associated event prevalence and severity will likely need to be contextualized to variability in individual ICUs patients, providers, and practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».