Abstract P6-09-01: Investigating the effectiveness of a psycho-educational behavioral intervention for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction in women with breast and gynecological cancer: Knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavioral change.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Approximately one third of individuals receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer experience cancer-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD). CRCD significantly impacts quality of life, employment, and social relationships, and can hinder ability to return to pre-cancer activities. The cause is likely multi-factorial, and currently no medical treatment exists. The Cancer Survivorship Program at Princess Margaret Hospital provides a behavioral-intervention for patients with CRCD. The single, one-on-one, hour long session provides information and compensatory strategies to improve knowledge, self-management skills, and decrease the impact of cognitive dysfunction on daily life. Methods: A mixed-method study assessed patient perceptions. Eligible women had been or were currently being treated for a diagnosis of breast or gynecological cancer and were English speakers. Likert-scale based questionnaires were administered immediately before, immediately after, and 6 weeks post-intervention. Six parameters were evaluated quantitatively: i) program delivery, ii) perception of knowledge, iii) distress, iv) self-efficacy, v) behavior change, and vi) behavioral change effectiveness. Ten individuals also participated in qualitative, semi-structured audio-recorded interviews 1–6 weeks post questionnaire completion. Responses were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Results: 72 female cancer survivors (61 breast; 11 gynecological; mean age 51.3) completed questionnaires. Immediately post-intervention, patients reported significant increases in perception of knowledge, self-efficacy, and decreases in CRCD-related distress, and these improvements were maintained at 6 week follow up (p < .01 in all cases). Participants reported numerous benefits associated with increased knowledge, including a sense of validation and reassurance, and increased confidence and success in managing their symptoms. No statistically significant differences in intervention effectiveness were observed as a function of patient age (older or younger than 50), education (greater or less than grade 12), or employment status (skilled worker or higher vs lower). However, individuals of low employment status were less satisfied with the volume of information in the intervention. Interviews indicated their preference for an additional session to reinforce the techniques discussed. Thematic analysis also indicated that adoption of new compensatory strategies was associated with a sense of control, confidence and pride for all patients; although barriers were identified for some that prevented long-term use (e.g. techniques take time and effort). Employment distress was mainly tied to difficulties with work tasks. Conclusions: A one-hour, psycho-educational behavioral intervention can be effective for breast and gynecological cancer patients suffering from CRCD. Benefits can last at least 6 weeks. Results suggest a need for better intervention integration with oncology appointments, a follow-up session to help individuals assimilate CRCD information, and increased session personalization to address individual difficulties and job concerns. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-01.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».