MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2074332548 · doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0202

No Insignificant Part: The Rhodesia Native Regiment and the East Africa Campaign of the First World War (review)

2009· article· en· W2074332548 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jan‐Bart Gewald

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Military History · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAfrican history and culture studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpanish Civil WarHistoryContext (archaeology)World War IIWhite (mutation)Ancient historyClassicsArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: No Insignificant Part: The Rhodesia Native Regiment and the East Africa Campaign of the First World War Jan-Bart Gewald No Insignificant Part: The Rhodesia Native Regiment and the East Africa Campaign of the First World War. By Timothy J. Stapleton. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0-88920-498-0. Maps. Photographs. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xii, 188. $55.00. Authored by a respected historian of Africa, this well written and accessible book will be rewarding reading for anybody with an interest in World War One. In less than two hundred pages Stapleton successfully restores to history the forgotten (if not consciously ignored) record of African soldiers who served in the Rhodesia Native Regiment (RNR) in East Africa between 1916 and 1918. The history of World War One in Africa, let alone the role of Africans in this war, remains an under-researched topic. Apart from being seen as marginal to events in Europe, the war in Africa is often obscured by rather romantic representations of the war as a "gentleman's war" fought between European soldiers in the "heart of darkness". In contrast to this, Stapleton shows the war for what it was; deadly and one in which "every military operation described by white commanders in the official records depended on the participation of numerous and often anonymous black soldiers" (p. 8). In the course of ten chapters, Stapleton succinctly describes and discusses the context and history of the establishment, deployment, and eventual demobilization of the RNR in the East African Campaign. At the outbreak of war European settlers in Rhodesia, present-day Zimbabwe, had volunteered en masse. By early 1916 "tropical disease and lack of replacement manpower" (p. 19) had decimated the all-white Rhodesia Regiment (RR), and the two battalions deployed were demobilized before the East Africa Campaign had come to an end. Desperate for manpower, the go-ahead was given for the establishment of a unit drawn from amongst Rhodesia's African population. Chapter two discusses the socio-political context from which these African soldiers were drawn, as well as the impact of the war on colonial society as a whole. Chapter three deals with the background of the soldiers, the majority of which had been involved in wage labour before enlisting. The training of the new recruits and their deployment is dealt with in chapter four, whilst the following chapters deal with the RNR at war. Of all the chapters in the book, military buffs will be most satisfied with chapters five to nine with their blow by blow accounts of the RNR in action. Tragically, after two years of extensive combat, it was not enemy action but the 1918 influenza pandemic that killed "more askari … than pretty well … the whole campaign" (p. 133). Throughout, Stapleton shows that during the whole campaign the issue of race, in which race as opposed to merit influenced authority, was disproved by the actions of the African soldiers. However, with the idea of European superiority being so central to colonial society, attitudes changed slowly within the military and not at all in settler society. [End Page 296] Driven by genuine interest and concern, Stapleton has written an excellent jargon-free monograph. He has done the memory of the soldiers of the RNR an immeasurable service and it is to be hoped that his work will serve as an incentive to others. Jan-Bart Gewald African Studies Centre, University of Leiden Leiden, The Netherlands Copyright © 2009 The Society for Military History

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,689
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Military HistoryMême sujetAfrican history and culture studiesTravaux en français237 207