Permeability Effects in a Vapour Extraction (VAPEX) Heavy Oil Recovery Process
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Vapour extraction (VAPEX) process is an effective heavy oil recovery technology because of its significant viscosity reduction through sufficient solvent dissolution and possible asphaltene precipitation. In the past, several researchers have studied the specific effect of permeability on the stabilized heavy oil production rate during a VAPEX heavy oil recovery process. However, physical modeling with relatively low permeabilities close to a typical heavy oil reservoir permeability has not gained enough attention. In this paper, an experimental study is conducted by using a visual rectangular sand-packed high-pressure physical model to examine the detailed effects of permeability ranging from sixteen to several hundred Darcies. More specifically, the heavy oil production rate, solvent-oil ratio, asphaltene content of produced oil, and residual oil saturation are measured. Also, the solvent vapour chamber evolution is visualized. The actual permeability of the sand-packed physical model is measured prior to each VAPEX test and propane is used to extract heavy oil from the sand-packed physical model at P=800 kPa and T=20.8 °C. It is found that, in general, the existing Butler-Mokrys analytical model underestimates the heavy oil production rate if the permeability is high enough and the asphaltene deposition does not plug the porous medium. It is also found that a reduced permeability causes the solvent-oil ratio to increase so that the asphaltene precipitation and deposition may become pronounced. As a consequence, the asphaltene precipitation results in further viscosity reduction of produced oil and an unexpected relatively high oil production rate. The asphaltene content of produced oil is measured to verify the asphaltene deposition phenomenon. Furthermore, the entire VAPEX heavy oil recovery process is visualized to determine the residual oil saturations inside the solvent vapour chamber at different times by using the material balance equation and to study the variations of the so-called solvent vapour chamber rising, spreading and falling phases with the measured permeability of the physical model. Introduction How to effectively and economically recover heavy oil from the tremendous heavy oil and bitumen deposits in Western Canada becomes a key technical issue as the conventional crude oil is being depleted1–3. The extremely high viscosity and almost immobile condition of these deposits under the actual reservoir conditions cause their primary oil recovery to be as low as 6–8% of the original-oil-in-place (OOIP)4, 5. Some thermal-based heavy oil and bitumen recovery processes are currently being applied in oil fields to enhance heavy oil and bitumen recovery, such as steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), cyclic steam stimulation (CSS), and in-situ combustion (ISC)6, 7. Nevertheless, some economic constraints for applying these thermal-based oil recovery processes arise if the high costs of steam generation and excessive heat losses into thin oil reservoirs are considered. In addition, greenhouse gases emission, source water supply and produced water treatment make other enhanced oil recovery techniques more economically viable and environmentally friendly8. The vapour extraction (VAPEX) process is a non-thermal heavy oil recovery process, in which a vaporized solvent is injected from an upper horizontal injection well into a heavy oil reservoir. The solvent-diluted oil is then drained downward by gravity to a lower horizontal production well9, 10. In the past, the VAPEX was experimentally modeled by Butler and Mokrys11 in a vertical Hele-Shaw cell by using two different bitumen
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».