MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2074347211 · doi:10.1353/jmh.2007.0037

Bravest of the Brave: The Story of the Victoria Cross, and: In the Face of the Enemy: The Complete History of the Victoria Cross and New Zealand (review)

2007· article· en· W2074347211 sur OpenAlex
W. Robert Houston

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Military History · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAustralian History and Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAdversaryFace (sociological concept)CommonwealthPublishingIndex (typography)HistoryMedia studiesLawSociologyPolitical scienceSocial science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Bravest of the Brave: The Story of the Victoria Cross, and: In the Face of the Enemy: The Complete History of the Victoria Cross and New Zealand W. Robert Houston Bravest of the Brave: The Story of the Victoria Cross. By John Glanfield. Stroud, U.K.: Sutton Publishing, 2006. ISBN 0-7509-3695-9. Photographs. Illustrations. Bibliography. Index. Pp. viii, 182. £14.99. In the Face of the Enemy: The Complete History of the Victoria Cross and New Zealand. By Glyn Harper and Colin Richardson. Auckland, N.Z.: Harper Collins, 2006. ISBN 1-86950-522-0. Photographs. Notes. Bibliography. Index. NZ$35.99. These two books are very different. Bravest of the Brave is a brief, popular work, while In the Face of the Enemy is a longer, more scholarly book. The former is an overview, while the latter is focused on one country in the Commonwealth of Nations (formerly the British Empire). What unites them is their focus on what is arguably the most prestigious and most difficult to earn award for gallantry "in the face of the enemy"—the Victoria Cross. The proximity of their publication is clearly related to the fact that 2006 marks the 150th anniversary of the creation and first awards of the Cross, coupled with the fact that Canada, Australia, and New Zealand have all recently restructured their national awards systems to separate them from Great Britain. Interestingly enough, each country has chosen to retain the Victoria Cross as their highest award for bravery "in the face of the enemy." Bravest of the Brave is a deceptive book. It appears to be just one more in a series of popular works on the Victoria Cross. That perception proves to be a [End Page 287] mistaken one. Glanfield clearly knows his subject very thoroughly, even though he is neither a trained historian nor uses scholarly notation. He takes the reader through a thorough description of the origin of the medal, the development of its design, its various warrants (regulations for award), and, quite interestingly, how the British and Australian authorities (the second with the cooperation of New Zealand) have used the technique of X-ray fluorescence to determine where the metal used in the Crosses has come from since the first were issued in 1856. Glanfield shrewdly narrates selected awards and nonawards of the Cross over the last 150 years to demonstrate the changing criteria for the VC and the sheer capriciousness involved in who did or did not receive one. He does this narration so well that the reader is actually caught off guard when he finally realizes the author's purpose. Glanfield is a very effective writer and quite a good self-taught historian. Bravest of the Brave certainly belongs in all libraries as a quickly read, but very informative, introduction to this subject. Sadly, one cannot say the same of In the Face of the Enemy. This book, by two military academics, fails to fulfill its aim to be the definitive work on the Victoria Cross and New Zealand. Harper and Richardson begin with a brief history of the creation of the medal, where they cover much the same ground as Glanfield. They neither write as well as he, nor are they as thorough and perceptive as he is. They then proceed to plough through every campaign where New Zealanders earned the VC. The authors reasonably assume that they ought to explain the context in which these medals were awarded. Unfortunately, they do a very bad job with this background material. They provide no maps whatsoever, which means the reader is often completely lost. Harper and Richardson also further damage their book by their incessant complaining that New Zealanders received consistently fewer VCs than they should have. While they make an excellent case that New Zealand officers serving in New Zealand units during the First World War were shut out of consideration for such awards by their own commanders, Andrew Russell and Alexander Godley, they then hammer away at the perceived unfairness to their fellow countrymen in all conflicts to the point where the reader becomes heartily tired of it. In fact, they themselves acknowledge the capriciousness of the award...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,014
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,447
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0140,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,009
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0040,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle