The physiological and pathophysiological modulation of the endocrine function of the heart
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Under physiological conditions, the endocrine heart contributes to the maintenance of cardiovascular homeostasis through the polypeptide hormones ANF and BNP, which are members of the natriuretic peptide (NP) family. Given that NPs are of interest from the basic and clinical points of view, the genetic expression and secretion of ANF and BNP as well as the nature of the interaction of these hormones with their receptors has been the subject of extensive studies since the discovery of ANF in 1980. Following hemodynamic overload, increased secretion of NPs by the heart can be seen. This change may occur without an increase in gene expression as observed for atrial NPs following acute volume expansion, or it can occur with an increase in both ANF and BNP gene expression in atria only as seen in mineralocorticoid escape during which it is obvious that a critical decrease in hormone stores must be reached before transcriptional activation occurs. Chronic hemodynamic pressure or volume overload results in increased expression of NPs in atria and ventricles. Under these circumstances, the increased production of BNP by hypertrophic ventricles changes the normal plasma concentration ratio of ANF to BNP, a fact that has clinical diagnostic and prognostic implications. There are exceptions to this rule: chronic, severe L-NAME hypertension, which may occur without left ventricular hypertrophy, does not cause this effect and increased ventricular NP gene expression can occur in mineralocorticoid hypertension before detectable ventricular hypertrophy. Atrial and ventricular NP gene expression appears to be under different transcriptional control because pharmacological treatments such as chronic ACE inhibition or ET(A) receptor blockade can reverse the increased ventricular NP expression but has no detectable effect on atrial NP gene expression. This is not unlike the myosin heavy chain switch that is observed in certain pathologies, and can be pharmacologically reversed in a manner similar to NPs in the ventricles but it does not occur in atrial muscle. These observations made in vivo or using isolated adult atria often differ strikingly from results obtained using the mixed phenotype afforded by cardiocytes in culture, indicating that the kinds of questions addressed by each approach must be judiciously chosen. G-protein coupled receptor-mediated actions of neurohumors such as endothelin and phenylephrine are normally used to stimulate NP gene expression and release in different in vitro models. The main physiological stimulus for increased ANF release, atrial muscle stretch, also appears to rely on G-protein-coupled mechanisms. Alternative agonists and receptor types at play are suggested by the finding that circulating levels of BNP are selectively increased before and during overt cardiac allograft rejection episodes in human patients. The data suggest that enhanced BNP plasma levels could form a basis for a noninvasive test for cardiac allograft rejection. However, the molecular mechanism by which expression of NPs are regulated in the transplanted heart is not well understood. Conditioned medium from mixed lymphocyte reaction cultures, considered an in vitro model of transplantation immunity, induces specific upregulation of BNP as do individual pro-inflammatory cytokines. Findings such as these suggest that the study of NPs will continue to produce a wealth of information relevant to basic and clinical scientists.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».