Severe bradycardia during scalp nerve block in patient undergoing awake craniotomy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sir, Scalp nerve block is a commonly performed procedure for awake craniotomy. Though relatively safe, this procedure can sometimes produce severe hemodynamic disturbances. Here, we have highlighted such a complication and its possible explanation. A 32-year-old patient was admitted to our hospital with complaints of left-sided headache and generalized seizures since five months. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a left frontal mass. As the lesion was near eloquent areas (speech and motor) of the brain, the patient was scheduled for awake craniotomy (left frontal) under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). All of the laboratory investigations were within normal range. Routine monitors were attached. Intravenous fentanyl 50 mcg and propofol 30 mg were administered. On the left side, three nerves (supraorbital, supratrochlear, and zygomaticotemporal) were each blocked with 3 mL of local anesthetic mixture (5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1: 200,000 and 5 mL of 2% lidocaine) solution. During local anesthetic infiltration over the left supratrochlear nerve, sudden bradycardia (heart rate <35 bpm) was noticed for 15 seconds followed by hypotension (blood pressure <80/46 mmHg). The surgeon was asked to stop the procedure immediately, and the hemodynamic changes reverted to normal. The patient was fully conscious during this episode; the rest of the procedure went uneventful. Hemodynamic disturbances have been reported during local anesthetic infiltrations and usually linked to their toxic side effects or hypersensitivity reactions.[1] In addition, the usual response is hypertension followed by reflex bradycardia. The other possible mechanism maybe vasovagal which can be provoked during any sharp noxious stimuli or emotional stress.[2] However, there were no episodes of loss of consciousness and dizziness during these hemodynamic changes. Seizure episodes can also mimic these types of cardiovascular perturbations; however, there were no associated abnormal body movements.[3] Moreover, this episode occurred only during infiltration of the supratrochlear nerve and was abolished after removal of the stimulus. The probable mechanism related to this event maybe linked to the trigeminal cardiac reflex (TCR) which can be provoked by the stimulation of any sensory branch of the fifth cranial nerve and usually manifests as a sudden decrease in heart rate coupled with hypotension. This reflex can be produced by mechanical, electrical, and even chemical stimuli.[4] The rapid infiltration of local anesthetic solution might have caused local mechanical compression or stretch on the supratrochlear nerve, thus provoking this reflex. Opioid-induced sudden transient bradycardia is also unlikely, though opioids are one of the risk factors associated with TCR.[5] Thus, it is likely that the use of fentanyl just before the scalp nerve block might have been an additive to this event. The sensitivity of different branches of the trigeminal nerve for inciting TCR could be an area of further research. In conclusion, TCR can be a manifestation of scalp nerve block (trigeminal nerve territory) and may produce catastrophic consequences if not vigilantly monitored. The slow and incremental administration of local anesthetics may reduce the chances of such an event.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».