MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2075074529 · doi:10.4103/1658-354x.115344

Severe bradycardia during scalp nerve block in patient undergoing awake craniotomy

2013· article· en· W2075074529 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAnesthesia and Pain Management
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAnesthesiaBradycardiaCraniotomyHemodynamicsPropofolLidocaineHeart rateSurgeryBlood pressureInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir, Scalp nerve block is a commonly performed procedure for awake craniotomy. Though relatively safe, this procedure can sometimes produce severe hemodynamic disturbances. Here, we have highlighted such a complication and its possible explanation. A 32-year-old patient was admitted to our hospital with complaints of left-sided headache and generalized seizures since five months. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a left frontal mass. As the lesion was near eloquent areas (speech and motor) of the brain, the patient was scheduled for awake craniotomy (left frontal) under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). All of the laboratory investigations were within normal range. Routine monitors were attached. Intravenous fentanyl 50 mcg and propofol 30 mg were administered. On the left side, three nerves (supraorbital, supratrochlear, and zygomaticotemporal) were each blocked with 3 mL of local anesthetic mixture (5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1: 200,000 and 5 mL of 2% lidocaine) solution. During local anesthetic infiltration over the left supratrochlear nerve, sudden bradycardia (heart rate <35 bpm) was noticed for 15 seconds followed by hypotension (blood pressure <80/46 mmHg). The surgeon was asked to stop the procedure immediately, and the hemodynamic changes reverted to normal. The patient was fully conscious during this episode; the rest of the procedure went uneventful. Hemodynamic disturbances have been reported during local anesthetic infiltrations and usually linked to their toxic side effects or hypersensitivity reactions.[1] In addition, the usual response is hypertension followed by reflex bradycardia. The other possible mechanism maybe vasovagal which can be provoked during any sharp noxious stimuli or emotional stress.[2] However, there were no episodes of loss of consciousness and dizziness during these hemodynamic changes. Seizure episodes can also mimic these types of cardiovascular perturbations; however, there were no associated abnormal body movements.[3] Moreover, this episode occurred only during infiltration of the supratrochlear nerve and was abolished after removal of the stimulus. The probable mechanism related to this event maybe linked to the trigeminal cardiac reflex (TCR) which can be provoked by the stimulation of any sensory branch of the fifth cranial nerve and usually manifests as a sudden decrease in heart rate coupled with hypotension. This reflex can be produced by mechanical, electrical, and even chemical stimuli.[4] The rapid infiltration of local anesthetic solution might have caused local mechanical compression or stretch on the supratrochlear nerve, thus provoking this reflex. Opioid-induced sudden transient bradycardia is also unlikely, though opioids are one of the risk factors associated with TCR.[5] Thus, it is likely that the use of fentanyl just before the scalp nerve block might have been an additive to this event. The sensitivity of different branches of the trigeminal nerve for inciting TCR could be an area of further research. In conclusion, TCR can be a manifestation of scalp nerve block (trigeminal nerve territory) and may produce catastrophic consequences if not vigilantly monitored. The slow and incremental administration of local anesthetics may reduce the chances of such an event.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,707

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle