362 EFFECT OF TIME OF REMOVAL OF A PROGESTERONE RELEASING DEVICE AND GnRH TREATMENT ON THE INTERVAL TO AND DISTRIBUTION OF OVULATIONS IN SUPERSTIMULATED BEEF COWS
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
An experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of the time of removal of an intravaginal progesterone (P4) releasing device and GnRH treatment on the interval to and the distribution of ovulations in beef cows superstimulated with Folltropin-V (Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada). Red Angus donors (22 cows and 12 heifers) with a body condition score between 2.5 to 3.5 out of 5 were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups in a 2 × 2 factorial design. On Day 0, all donors received an i.m. DIB vaginal device (Syntex, Argentina) plus 2.5 mg estradiol-17ß and 50 mg P4 (Laboritorio Rio de Janeiro, Argentina). Superstimulatory treatments were initiated on Day 4, with a total dose of 320 mg (cows) or 200 mg (heifers) NIH-FSH-P1 (Folltropin-V; Bioniche Animal Health, Inc., Belleville, Ontario, Canada) in twice daily i.m. injections over 4 days. All cows received PGF treatment (150 µD(+)cloprostenol: Ciclase; Syntex) in the morning and afternoon of Day 6 and were randomly divided to have DIB devices removed at the time of the second PGF treatment (Day 6.5) or 12 h later (Day 7). On Day 8, donors were further subdivided to receive GnRH (0.050 mg Lecirelina, Gonasyn; Syntex) or no further treatment, and all cows were fixed-time AI either 60 and 72 h after the first PGF injection (0 h). All cows and heifers were examined by ultrasonography every 8 h for a period of 120 h commencing at the time of DIB removal, to determine the time and distribution of ovulations. For each cow, mean time of ovulation was used for the statistical analysis. The distributions of ovulations were compared among groups by Levene's test, and then by ANOVA (equal variances) or Friedman two-way non-parametric ANOVA (unequal variances). No significant differences were detected between cows and heifers (P > 0.13) for the parameters evaluated, and data were combined. There was no effect (P > 0.22) of treatment on the number of ovulations (GnRH: 12.6 ± 1.6 vs. no GnRH: 15.1 ± 1.1 and Day 6.5: 13.7 ± 1.3 vs. Day 7: 14.3 ± 1.5), or numbers of transferable embryos (GnRH: 5.1 ± 1.1 vs. no GnRH: 3.1 ± 0.8 and Day 6.5: 3.5 ± 0.8 vs. Day 7: 4.81 ± 0.1). However, there was a significant effect of GnRH treatment and a GnRH-by-time-of-DIB-removal interaction on the distribution of ovulations (P < 0.05; Table 1). The administration of GnRH in a superstimulatory protocol using P4 releasing devices results in earlier and more synchronous ovulations than when GnRH is not used. Table 1. Distribution of ovulations (hours after the first PGF) in superstimulated Red Angus donors treated with progesterone-releasing devices (DIB) for 6.5 or 7 days with and without GnRH treatment on Day 8
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle