Proceedings of the International Conference on Highly Frustrated Magnetism, Osaka, Japan, 15–19 August 2006
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Highly Frustrated Magnetism 2006 (HFM 2006) conference took place on 15–19 August 2006 at the Icho Kaikan of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. This conference was the third one of the series, following the first one in Waterloo, Canada (HFM 2000) [1] and the second one in Grenoble, France (HFM 2003) [2]. The HFM 2006 conference was held as a satellite of the International Conference on Magnetism (ICM 2006) held on 20–25 August 2006 in Kyoto, Japan. The conference attracted 191 participants from all over the world. The number of participants of the HFM conference series has been increasing steadily, from about 80 participants for HFM 2000 and about 120 participants for HFM 2003, demonstrating that highly frustrated magnetism is a rapidly growing area for research in condensed matter physics. The HFM 2006 conference consisted of four plenary talks by H Takagi, F Mila, P Mendels and B D Gaulin, 18 invited presentations and about 120 poster presentations from all areas of frustrated magnetism. In the evening on the 18th of August, a special session about 'the kagome story' was given by M. Mekata, where participants learned about the history of early-day research on frustrated magnetism and the origin of the word 'kagome' (see the picture below). Kagome lattice from a Japanese traditional woven bamboo basket. During the conference period, many stimulating discussions were held both inside and outside the conference room. The subjects covered in the conference included: Quantum frustrated magnetism and spin liquids Novel ordering of geometrically frustrated magnets Itinerant frustrated systems and novel superconductivity Spin glasses and random magnets Frustration effect on the coupling to lattice, orbital and charge degrees of freedom Exotic phenomena induced by macroscopic degeneracy Field effect on frustrated magnetism etc. This special issue of Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter is devoted to the proceedings of the HFM 2006 conference. The aim of these proceedings is to provide a scientific record of some of the topics that were presented at the conference. It contains 91 articles from the presentations given at the conference. All articles have been refereed by experts in the field. I am sure that the reader will enjoy these contributions and learn a lot from them. In view of the rapid growth of the field, it has been decided at the conference that the next HFM conference will be held in two years, in 2008, in the city of Braunshweig, Germany. References Gingras M (ed) 2000 Can. J. Phys. 79 1283-1597 Stewart R (ed) 2004 J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 16 S553-S922 Group photograph Finally, on behalf of the HFM 2006 Organizing Committee, I wish to deeply thank all the people who generously helped us in organizing and running the HFM 2006 conference. Committee Members International Advisory Committee Y Ajiro,Japan A Harrison, Great Britain S Bramwell, Great Britain R Kremer, Germany C Broholm, United States C Lacroix, France I Campbell, France F Mila, Switzerland B Gaulin, Canada A Ramirez, United States M Gingras, Canada K Ueda, Japan Hikaru Kawamura (Osaka, chairman) Hitoshi Ohta (Kobe, secretary) Satoru Maegawa (Kyoto, program) Zenji Hiroi (Tokyo, publication) Hirokazu Tsunetsugu (Kyoto, program and publication) Toshifumi Taniguchi (Osaka, local) Susumu Okubo (Kobe, homepage) Hajime Yoshino (Osaka, local) Organising committee: from left to right, H Yoshino, S Okubo, S Maegawa, H Kawamura, H Ohta, Z Hiroi, T Taniguchi, H Tsunetsugu.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,093 | 0,034 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».