Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Pink Snow: Homotextual Possibilities in Canadian Fiction Andrew Lesk (bio) Terry Goldie. Pink Snow: Homotextual Possibilities in Canadian Fiction Broadview. 264. $29.95 A very welcome addition to the burgeoning field of Canadian sexuality studies, Terry Goldie's Pink Snow first calls to mind another, recent entry, Peter Dickinson's Here Is Queer. In his 1999 examination of lesbian and gay homotexts, Dickinson answers Northrop Frye's ironically decisive 'Where is here?' by suggesting that Canadian literature has always exhibited - or, paradoxically, concealed - a surfeit of queer desire. Goldie's analysis shares with Dickinson many of the same authors, such as Richardson, Symons, and Findley, but differs in its sole focus on male authors. Goldie fully embraces the tenets of queer theory to explore works which do not necessarily evince obvious homosexual thematics and whose authors are not homosexual. The distinction is important, especially since Goldie's deeply deconstructive approach, grounded as it is in queer theory, allows him to move beyond those texts that may demonstrate an elementary and obvious homosexual subtext. Pink Snow, then, is a book more about the vicissitudes of desire than it is about homosexuality per se. With 'homotextual,' Goldie writes that he is using the gay-identified term to demonstrate that it is at once useful but limiting in its grounding [End Page 516] in gay thematic studies. Useful, because in his position as a gay studies (or minoritizing) critic, Goldie finds that 'what I read enfranchises both resistant and complicit readings,' and that his present work's aim of questioning that very position serves to further gay socio-cultural understanding. Limiting, because in order to avoid textual games in which homosexuality is reduced to 'Look! There's one!' Goldie, like the influential critic Judith Butler (on whom he greatly relies), wants to 'find a way of textualizing sexuality without making simplistic claims about embodiment and without completely removing the material which lies behind the text.' Despite some reservations I have about the deconstructive taxonomy employed by Goldie, the book is nevertheless admirable. Pink Snow is deeply infused with a thoroughgoing attention to homosexual history and antecedents, revealing not that a tradition of Canadian gay literature is being created but that it has always existed; it is simply that critics in this country have always ignored homosexual presence. From John Richardson's Wacousta through to Timothy Findley's The Wars, Canadian criticism has been particularly adept at avoiding what we now see as rather obvious. Goldie revisits these novels, in addition to Sinclair Ross's As for Me and My House, Ernest Buckler's The Mountain and the Valley, and Leonard Cohen's Beautiful Losers, in an effort to recast parts of the canon as necessarily and primarily homotextual. The surprises here are W.O. Mitchell's Who Has Seen the Wind and Robertson Davies's Fifth Business. With the former, Goldie suggests that the relations between the males derive from a kind of Platonism, 'associations built on mutual desire, for companionship and for the study of the systems of the world.' Goldie brilliantly mines the text in an incisive reading of the socially condemnatory context of 1947's conservative Canadian climate. With a not dissimilar critical verve, Goldie tackles the problematic use of the word 'queer' in Davies's novel as a springboard to discussing how Davies's rather evident homophobia collides with his seeming veneration of lesbianism, in so far as the latter might provide heterosexual men with a measure of titillation. The trope of homosexuality in Davies, nevertheless, might best be understood when examined as otherness. As with Mitchell's, Davies's ideal worlds consist of 'male life without the restrictions imposed by marriage' - and so, the ideal world here is not necessarily homosexual but is definitely homosocial. The other authors Goldie assesses are perhaps more familiar to us in that they are resolutely out: Scott Symons, David Watmough, Shyam Selvadurai, Tomson Highway, Peter McGehee, Stan Persky, Sky Gilbert, and Dennis Denisoff. And because many of the works of these authors are more contemporary, Goldie engages the important work of cross-cultural understanding, especially as he demonstrates how homosexuality in these novels is interwoven with immigration, colonialism, nationalism, class...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,012 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,030 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».