MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2075406426 · doi:10.1353/nin.2006.0038

Breaking into Baseball: Women and the National Pastime (review)

2006· article· en· W2075406426 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter Carino

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésViewpointsPassionMedia studiesCompendiumVariety (cybernetics)FandomSociologyAdvertisingHistoryPsychologyVisual artsArtComputer scienceSocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Breaking into Baseball: Women and the National Pastime Peter Carino (bio) Jean Hastings Ardell. Breaking into Baseball: Women and the National Pastime. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005, 278pp. With Breaking into Baseball, Jean Ardell offers a useful compendium of baseball history about women from a woman's perspective. The strength of this book is that Ardell examines the topic from multiple perspectives, each treating one of the various ways women have struggled and succeeded to engage and experience a game that has been slow to welcome them. After an introduction that establishes Ardell's own lifelong passion for the game and a chapter detailing women's early responses to the game (and it to them), she organizes the book through the various roles they have taken: as fans, groupies, players, umpires, front office personnel, and journalists. In total, the book offers a wide variety of viewpoints and provides a solid foundation in the history of women and baseball. Many of the roles Ardell examines could be the topic of a book itself, and she admits the same, noting in her introduction that space would not allow "detailed histories of the game's female pioneers" and directing readers to the work of others for more specific treatments of particular people and topics. This is not to point out a flaw. Indeed, providing an exhaustive analysis of a single or small number of women is not Ardell's purpose. Rather the strength of the book is its breadth, and even while covering wide terrain, Ardell provides a strong sense of already well-known baseball women, such as Effa Manley and Toni Stone, while introducing the reader to a number of lesser-known but equally interesting figures. In the chapter on umpires, for instance, she concludes with an account of the attempt to crack the Majors by Pam Postema, a name known to many fans. However, few fans know of earlier aspirants such as Bernice Gera, a thirty-five-year-old Brooklyn housewife who decided one day in 1966 that she wanted to be a Major League umpire and eventually reached the New York–Penn League, after a lengthy and enervating court battle with the National Association of Baseball Leagues. Though Gera's career ended abruptly, she paved the way for others, such as Christine Wren who umpired in the Midwest League in the 1970s. While most dedicated fans have heard of Ila Borders, the first female collegiate pitcher who had a three-year career in the Northern League, Ardell's relationship with this remarkable young woman (developed in the course of writing the book) enables her to provide more thorough information on Borders's battle to make it in the game than heretofore known. Even the most informed fans will be surprised to learn how difficult her attempt to crack the lineup was, including her fending off an attempted rape by college [End Page 127] teammates. Adding to Ardell's account, Borders wrote a short forward to the book and combined with Ardell's cogent analysis of her career, the two provide the readers with a strong sense of the socio-cultural complexity of Borders's attempt to break into one of the most recalcitrant male institutions in America. Ardell is also perhaps the first author to address the subject of baseball Annies. Lifting the curtain of secrecy on this topic is no easy task. While Ardell draws some information from player exposés by womanizers such as Bo Belinsky and Joe Pepitone, an extended case study of an anonymous ex-groupie, called "Betty" for the book, uncovers the psychology of the women who choose this shady path to the game and the players who take advantange of them. For fans who already know something of women in baseball, this book will provide even more information on lesser-known figures. For those whose knowledge of the topic is limited to A League of Their Own, this book will be a thorough education. The book is well researched with scholarly depth and by combining material from interviews, library research, and a personal tone, Ardell creates an engaging voice throughout. Indeed, her commitment to both baseball and the women who...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,042

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207