MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2075650674 · doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00170.x

Teaching & Learning Guide for: Multilingualism in Educational Contexts: Identities and Ideologies

2009· article· en· W2075650674 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janet M. Fuller

Notice bibliographique

RevueLanguage and Linguistics Compass · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMultilingual Education and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMultilingualismIdeologyLinguisticsSociologyPedagogyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Author’s Introduction This Teaching and Learning Guide is intended to provide instructors of courses in Sociolinguistics some guidance in incorporating the topic of multilingualism in educational contexts into their syllabi. Although schools the world over are increasingly serving multilingual populations, awareness of this reality has not, in many cases, sifted through to public consciousness, and incorporation of this topic into the sociolinguistic curriculum is a crucial step in addressing this gap in awareness. The incidence of multilingualism in educational contexts has increased greatly in the last few decades in a number of critical ways. First, while multilingualism has long been the norm in educational settings in places such as India and some countries of Africa, widespread multilingualism has only recently begun to be seen as a factor in education in many parts of the Americas, Europe, and Asia. Second, in addition to there being more regions of the world that have multilingual populations of schoolchildren, the demographics of these populations are also changing. There are increasing numbers of middle class professionals moving to countries in which immigrants were previously overwhelmingly citizens of poor countries who came to work unskilled jobs. Third, not only have different patterns of immigration led to a broader range of regions and social groups becoming multilingual, but the ability to speak more than one language is increasingly seen as desirable for those who stay put. Bilingual education or intensive language study for the children of majority language populations is gaining popularity in Europe, the United States, and Asia. What this amounts to is that multilingualism in schools is becoming more common, and the situations in which it occurs are as varied as the languages involved. This article addresses the social issues of language ideologies and identity construction in this context. Key readings Caldas‐Coulthard, Carmnen Rosa and Amelia Maria Fernandes Alves. 2008. ‘Mongrel selves’: identity change, displacement and multi‐positioning. Identity trouble: critical discourses and contested identities , ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas‐Coulthard and Rick Iedema, 120–42. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. This article offers an important viewpoint about the idea of the ‘third space’ created by bicultural and bilingual speakers and immigrants in particular. The authors note that people in the ‘third space’ are positioned this way, by themselves and others, because they are often not viewed as full members of their adopted culture and as émigrés are seen as no longer belonging in their culture of origin. This is a highly relevant aspect of multilingualism in all contexts. Cummins, Jim. 2001. Negotiating identities: education for empowerment in a diverse society (2nd edition). Los Angeles, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education. Chapter 1: Identities and Empowerment. The lasting message of this chapter is that educators are not trapped within discriminatory frameworks, but have the power to shape their students’ experiences. This text is based on the idea (pervasive in the social sciences) that ideologies and identities are constructed, and that this theoretical position can be applied in classroom contexts to enact change in educational practices. De Meija, Anne‐Marie. 2002. Power, prestige and bilingualism: international perspectives on elite bilingual education . Chapter 4: Teaching and learning in elite bilingual classrooms . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. De Meija provides a clear defense of the use of bilingual discourse in the classroom for both teachers and students. The position here flies in the face of the implicit position of ‘bilingualism through monolingualism’ which is often the philosophy in multilingual educational settings, that is, that languages should remain strictly separate and speakers should act like monolinguals in each language. De Meija endorses the use of two languages as a linguistic strategy for teaching and learning. Fitts, Shanan. 2006. Reconstructing the status quo: linguistic interaction in a dual‐language school. Bilingual Research Journal 29.337–65. This article addresses how language ideologies are tacit in institutional structure and how students and teachers conform to, and occasionally resist, the hegemony of normative monolingualism. For example, although the school is intended to create a bilingual student body, the children are at times asked to identify their (one) native language, and ‘bilingual’ becomes code for ‘Latino/a’. Further, bilingualism is assumed to be enacted by speaking one language at a time, thus negating the importance of mixed language speech in identity construction. Heller, Monica. 1999. Linguistic minorities and modernity: a sociolinguistic ethnography . Chapter 4: Being bilingual . New York, NY: Longman. This chapter of the ethnography of a French‐language school in Toronto, Ontario, discusses the linguistic behavior of different segments of the student population, vividly portraying the how the uses and statuses of English and different varieties of French are used by the students not just to construct their own social identities but to promote and resist specific language ideologies. Although proficiency in French is necessary to be successful, it is only a particular kind of French which gives a speaker access to cultural capital and academic success. Links http://www.unavarra.es/tel2l/eng/MBELinks.htm Tel2l stand for Teacher Education by Learning in 2 Languages, and this site includes an introduction to the basics of bilingual education as well as overviews of bilingual programs in the U.S.A., Canada, Germany, France, England, Wales, and Luxemburg. http://www.cal.org/index.html The Center for Applied Linguistics website with links to pages on English Language Learners, including but not limited to a page on two‐way immersion in the United States ( http://www.cal.org/jsp/TWI/SchoolListings.jsp ) http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/Eurydice This site is for ‘the information network about education in Europe’, and has links to various reports about education, including such things as ‘Integrating Immigrant Children Into Schools in Europe’ and ‘Content and Integrated Learning at Schools in Europe’ (this deals with teaching certain subjects in a foreign language, called Bilingualer Fachsachunterricht in German). http://www.thomasandcollier.com/index.htm This link provides access to research by Wayne Thomas and Virginia Collier on educational issues, including bilingual education, in the United States. http://www.id21.org/insights/insights‐ed05/insightsEdn5.pdf

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,207
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,694

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0040,005
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2070,175

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,459
Écart entre enseignants0,414 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLanguage and Linguistics CompassMême sujetMultilingual Education and PolicyTravaux en français237 207