MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2076342492 · doi:10.2118/08-02-17-tn

Underground Gas Storage in a Partially Depleted Gas Reservoir

2008· article· en· W2076342492 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of Calgary
Mots-clésPetroleum engineeringNatural gas fieldEnvironmental scienceNatural gasProcess (computing)EngineeringComputer scienceWaste management

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The main objective of this study is to perform a real case study of an Iranian gas condensate reservoir for the purpose of underground gas storage. Doing such a study for this reservoir will aid in the development of this technology and will also demonstrate a new concept for underground gas storage in partially depleted gas reservoirs. After gathering some data about the reservoir and preparing a geological model for the field, a simulation plan was considered for this field. A geostatic model was converted to a dynamic one by assigning reservoir fluid and rock data. Finally, a compositional model of the reservoir was prepared and verified to be accurate through a history matching process. After verifying the accuracy of the model and validating it, different scenarios for underground gas storage were developed. Depletion and gas storage scenarios were constructed for the field and results were obtained. Gas storage in a partially depleted gas reservoir was also considered in these scenarios for developing this field. After comparing different scenarios, some practical results were achieved and the best scenario for developing this field was chosen. Introduction An underground gas storage system can be defined as a combination of a constant supply with a variable demand for economic advantage(1). In other words, it helps to combine low summer season demand and high winter season demand to ensure that supply is maintained as a constant. The whole process is comprised of injecting natural gas or (rarely) other gases into the subsurface reservoir during periods that demand falls below the gas supply. When demands exceed the supply, the gas will be withdrawn from the reservoir. Fluctuating demand, due to temperature and climate, makes it necessary in many cases for the pipelines that inject or withdraw the gas be used efficiently(2). It also helps to have effective delivery during peak demand. This process can also be adapted to producing oil or condensate and can be considered as an IOR method(3). Increasing demand for gas in many areas of the world make storage plan development and effective use of existing storage sources a priority to ensure engineering and economic advantages. Figure 1 illustrates the relationship between natural gas supply and demand and clarifies the importance of storing gas during low demand periods in order that it may be used in high demand periods. Reservoir Summary A gas condensate reservoir that is located in central Iran is chosen for the purpose of underground gas storage. This field was FIGURE 1: Natural gas supply and demand(2). Available in Full Paper. discovered in 1955 and production started in 1959. It has a structure that is a northwest-southeast trending anticline approximately 25 km long and about five km wide. The structure was investigated by surface and seismic surveys and eight wells were drilled in the field. The production zone is in a formation of Oligo-Miocene limestone and is marly lime. The top of the producing zone is approximately at 5,200 ft.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,416
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,945

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle