Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Acoustic phonetics is a relatively young science, having been systematized with the 1960 publication of Gunnar Fant's Acoustic Theory of Speech Production.Fant's text presented the theory buttressed by his own empirical work as well as by modeling efforts by scientists working in the United States, and the field of acoustic phonetics and its many associated disciplines ͑speech physiology, speech perception, speech synthesis, and automatic speech and speaker recognition, to name a few͒ was off and running.One of the scientists who performed some of the early, well-known modeling work was Professor Kenneth Stevens of MIT, who with Dr. Arthur House extended some of the concepts of the acoustic theory in novel ways.Now, Professor Stevens has written a text entitled Acoustic Phonetics, and it is a remarkable accomplishment.The text not only presents the stateof-the-art 40 years removed from Fant's book, but employs a probing, didactic approach that gives the material the feel of having evolved under the influence of teaching many students.This almost certainly accounts for the linear, crystal-clear way in which the information is developed and applied, and for the very creative use of figures and charts.It seems to me that after reading the ten chapters of this book, a motivated student or interested scientist with little or no previous knowledge of acoustic phonetics would know quite a lot about the subject, and in a fair amount of depth.This reader would also understand, very clearly, Professor Stevens' point of view about this material, summarized in the preface: ''The theme of this book is to explore the͑se͒ relations between the discrete linguistic features and their articulatory and acoustic manifestations'' ͑p.vii͒.Chapter 1 presents an overview of the anatomy and physiology of speech production.The anatomy is much like that presented in many textbooks dealing with the head, neck, and respiratory system, but Stevens also brings in more recent information, specifically on the fine structure of the vocal folds as well as on cross-sectional geometries of the vocal tract and sinuses derived from magnetic resonance imaging studies.The speech physiology section of the chapter is most impressive and to this writer's knowledge unique in the sense of not being available in any other source book on speech production or acoustics.This section contains extensive material on aerodynamic processes and articulatory kinematics, both critical for much of the acoustic modeling presented in subsequent chapters.Chapter 2 is a treatise on source mechanisms in speech acoustics.The accepted theory of speech acoustics is often referred to as the source-filter theory, because the output of the vocal tract is a combination of source and filter mechanisms; stated in acoustic terms, the acoustic properties of the filter shape the acoustic properties of the source.Sources can be located at lots of different locations throughout the speech mechanism, and include most notably the periodic source generated by the vibrating vocal folds and the various aperiodic sources generated at the level of the larynx and throughout the vocal tract.Stevens devotes a good deal of attention to the theory of vocal-fold vibration and its aerodynamic and acoustic consequences.This fairly complex material is developed as a series of modeling steps that always has one eye on the underlying motions of the vocal folds and the other on the aerodynamic consequences of those motions, the prize
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».