MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2076863510 · doi:10.1212/wnl.78.1_meetingabstracts.s01.004

Efficacy and Safety Results from Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif(R) Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis II (CARE-MS II): A Phase 3 Study in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Relapsed on Prior Therapy (S01.004)

2012· article· en· W2076863510 sur OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey Cohen, Cary Twyman, Douglas L. Arnold, Alasdair Coles, Christian Confavreux, Edward Fox, H.‐P. Hartung, Eva Havrdová, Krzysztof Selmaj, H L Weiner, Tamara Miller, Stephen Lake, David Margolin, MA Panzara, Alastair Compston

Notice bibliographique

RevueNeurology · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAlemtuzumabMultiple sclerosisExpanded Disability Status ScaleGlatiramer acetateInternal medicineInterferon beta-1aRandomized controlled trialRelapsing remittingCohortNatalizumabPhysical therapyInterferon betaTransplantationImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Objective: Evaluate the effect of alemtuzumab on relapse and disability versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients who have relapsed on prior therapy. Background Alemtuzumab was significantly more effective than SC IFNB-1a in two clinical trials with treatment-naive RRMS patients. Treatment options are limited for RRMS patients experiencing disease activity during therapy, and few controlled studies have been conducted to determine their appropriate management. Design/Methods: CARE-MS II is a 2-year rater-blinded trial with RRMS patients who have relapsed during prior therapy. Alemtuzumab treatment was 12 mg/day (or 24 mg/day in an exploratory cohort) by intravenous administration for 5 days at study start and 3 days one year later. IFNB-1a treatment was 44 mcg SC 3-times weekly throughout the study. Entry criteria included 18-55 years of age, MS symptom onset within 10 years, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≤5. Primary endpoints include relapses adjudicated by an independent panel and time to sustained accumulation of disability assessed by blinded evaluators. Results: 840 patients from 180 centers in 23 countries were randomized. Baseline characteristics (mean) were: age 35 years; disease duration 3.9 years; EDSS 2.7; with 1.6 and 2.7 relapses in 1 and 2 years prior to study entry, respectively. The most common prior MS therapies were interferon-beta (78.6%) or glatiramer acetate (32.5%); less than 5% of patients had received other prior MS therapy (some patients received more than one therapy). Conclusions: Database lock and study analysis will occur in late 2011. The principal efficacy and safety results will be presented. ®Rebif is a registered trademark of EMD Serono, Inc. Supported by: Genzyme, a Sanofi company and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals. Disclosure: Dr. Cohen has received personal compensation for activities with Biogen Idec, Eli Lilly & Company, Novartis, and Vaccinex. Dr. Cohen has received research support for activities with Biogen Idec, BioMS, Genzyme Corporation, Novartis, Synthon, and Teva Neuroscience. Dr. Twyman has received personal compensation for activities with Genzyme Corporation as a consultant, speaker and participant on advisory boards. Dr. Twyman has received research support from Genzyme Corporation. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Genentech, Inc., NeuroRx Research, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Schering, Serono, Inc., and Teva Neuroscience. Dr. Arnold Dr. Arnold has received research support from Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Genentech, Inc., NeuroRx Research, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Schering, Serono, Inc., and Teva Neuroscience. Dr. Coles has received personal compensation for activities with Genzyme Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, Inc., and Merck Serono as a consultant and/or speaker. Dr. Coles has received research support from Genzyme Corportation. Dr. Confavruex has received personal compensation for activities with Biogen Dompe, Biogen Idec, Gemacbio, Genzyme Corporation, Hertie Foundation, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Neuroscience, UCB Pharma, Bayer Schering, and Merck Serono. Dr. Confavruex has received research support from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceuticals, and Teva Neuroscience. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Biogen Idec, EMD Serono, Genzyme Corporation, Novartis, Opexa Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc, and Teva Neuroscience. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in an editorial capacity for Neura. Dr. Fox has received research support from Biogen Idec, Eli Lilly & Company, EMD Serono, Genzyme Corporation, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Teva Neuroscience. Dr. Hartung has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Biogen Idec, BioMS, Genzyme Corporation, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis and Teva as a speaker and/or consultant. Dr. Havrodova has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Biogen Idec, Genzyme Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, Inc., Novartis, Merck, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Serono, Inc., and Teva as consultant, speaker and/or advisory board participant. Dr. Selmaj has received personal compensation for activities with Genzyme, Ono, and Biogen Idec. Dr. Weiner has received personal compensation for activities with Biogen Idec, Novartis, Serono, Inc., Teva Neurosciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Nasvax, Xenoport and Genzyme Corporation as consulting and/or speaking activities. Dr. Weiner has received research support from Merck Serono. Dr. Miller has received personal compensation for activities with Allergan, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Forest, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, and Teva as a speaker. Dr. Miller has received research support from Allergan, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Elan, Teva, Novartis, Ono, Sanofi Aventis, EMD Serono, and Roche-Genetech. Dr. Lake has received personal compensation for activities with Genzyme as an employee. Dr. Margolin has received personal compensation for activities with Genzyme Corporation as an employee. Dr. Panzara has received personal compensation for activities with Biogen Idec as an employee.Dr. Panzara holds stock and/or stock options in Biogen Idec. Dr. Compston has received personal compensation for activities with Genzyme Corporation as a speaker. Dr. Compston has received research support from Genzyme Corporation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,028

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,105
Tête enseignante GPT0,340
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNeurology→Même sujetMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→Travaux en français237 207→