MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2076948379 · doi:10.1353/aiq.2003.0002

A Mutually Comprehensible World?: Native Americans, Europeans, and Play in Eighteenth-Century America

2002· article· en· W2076948379 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth J. Cohen

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Indian Quarterly · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSports, Gender, and Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeorge (robot)HistoryHonorArt historyLawAncient historyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Captain George Etherington awoke to a particularly warm day on 2 June 1763, but the "sultry" conditions hardly dampened the British celebration of their king's birthday. Even at faraway Fort Michilimackinac, on land the French had not yet formally ceded, British traders and soldiers planned festivities. It seemed to Etherington that even the local Natives wanted to participate in the holiday. In the previous months the captain had dismissed as rumor fur traders' descriptions of war belts and malicious plotting among local Ottawa and Chippewa villagers. On 2 June the Chippewa traveled across the eight-mile strait that separated their island home from the fort on the northern tip of the Lower Michigan peninsula. They invited Etherington and his garrison of nearly forty men to watch a match of "baggat'iway" or "le jeu de la crosse" organized in honor of the special day. 1 The British soldiers and traders at the fort had familiarity with Native American lacrosse. A dispatch from Etherington later that day told Major Robert Rogers in Detroit that "the Indians were playing ball as usual nigh the fort." 2 As the British walked out of the fort to observe the match, the game's unruliness would have grabbed their attention. Eighteenth-century Chippewa lacrosse had no time limit, no boundaries, and no rules restricting stick-wielding. Scores of Chippewa players competed at once, brandishing two-foot-long sticks as they either hurled the ball at one of two tall poles in an effort to score, or whacked an opponent's "racket" to dislodge the sphere. Sometimes a swing missed an opponent's stick. Observers noted that "frequently the ball carrier is disabled by being struck across the arm or leg, thus compelling his retirement." A pouch intended to hold the ball lay at the end of each racket, but the pouch measured only slightly wider than the diameter of the ball so players infrequently caught it out of the air. Once the ball hit the ground a vicious melee for control of it could last for minutes. 3 The sport's violence and disorganization might have reminded the soldiers of English football. Most noncommissioned soldiers belonged to the lower [End Page 67] sort in British society, whose traditional activities featured physical aggression. As in contemporary English football, tactical passing rarely appeared in eighteenth-century lacrosse. Long throws, individual efforts, and blurry masses of thundering feet comprised the key elements of a match. 4 Enticed by viewing such activity close to home, the British soldiers left Fort Michilimackinac to spectate. Chippewa supporters also navigated the straits to watch the game, but they gambled and cheered amongst themselves. 5 Shouts and calls from the varied clusters of spectators thus added to the cacophony of the players' voices, sticks, and feet. As spectators conversed and yelled amidst the frenzy of the match, the lacrosse ball suddenly shot skyward and floated over players, spectators, and then the palisade wall. With no boundaries to the field, players rushed past the observers into the fort. Etherington and the soldiery waited, expecting to see the ball launched back over and the herd of players galloping out of the stockade. The next thing the captain and his men saw had nothing to do with a baggat'iway ball. The chaos of the sport and the celebration of the holiday combined to distract the British soldiers. In a place where rum existed as a vital trade good, the garrison probably drank to celebrate the holiday. The Indians' dedication of the game to the king's birthday fostered British belief in Chippewa goodwill. Inebriation and a sense of trust made the British less cautious, explaining why many soldiers left the fort unarmed. The celebratory atmosphere also kept them from questioning the long overgarments worn by Chippewa spectators despite the heat of the day, and the noise around the playing field prevented them from distinguishing Chippewa calls...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,050
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,100

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0310,031
Communication savante0,0150,007
Science ouverte0,0010,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Indian QuarterlyMême sujetSports, Gender, and SocietyTravaux en français237 207