Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Anthony Westell is a former journalist with The Evening Standard, The Globe and Mail, and The Toronto Star. He also taught in Carleton University's School of Journalism. Winner of three National Newspaper Awards, he is a member of the Canadian News Hall of Fame, and is the author of four books, including his recent autobiography, The Inside Story: A Life in Journalism. Now retired, he contributes commentary to The Globe and Mail and the Literary Review of Canada.TO BEGIN, I HAVE NO IDEA what kind of North America Canadians want--and I doubt that most Canadians know, beyond the broadest generalities--peace, order, good government, life, liberty and happiness (the real thing, not just the pursuit). I do know, however, what I think they are going to get. That is a union with the United States, in one form or another--and within the next quarter century (by which time I shall no longer be available to kick around if events prove me wrong). One more cautionary note: this is, obviously, not the best time to make this case, but all things shall pass--even George W. Bush next year, with any luck.I think political union is the future for several reasons. It will be the logical outcome of a trend clear in history. Ever since the Europeans first arrived, North America has been moving toward unification into one political state. First, hundreds of native nations were collapsed into a score of colonies. Next, the colonies were gathered into three nation states. This trend will continue because it has been driven, principally, by the competition for resources, power and profits, and has been made possible by new technologies--firearms to overcome the aboriginals, railroads and telegraphs to link the colonies and create markets for industrialization, and, now, the electronic networks of post-industrialism.The tide of technology is still flooding, and, in a capitalist economy, when technology offers a way for capital to earn a higher return, business must seize the opportunity--or give way to competitors who do. Continental unification is already far advanced and not only in economic terms. (Think of defence, entertainment, professional sports, media of information and ideas.)Economic integration alone, however, urges us toward political integration. In Canada, as in other Western democracies, the elected government both regulates the capitalist economic sector and redistributes the wealth it produces--making us social democracies (even the US).No major party proposes to change the system--to full-blooded capitalism or to outright socialism-- so the only significant difference between mainstream parties, certainly in Canada, is how much to regulate and how much to redistribute. The voters make that choice and hold the government they elect responsible for the economic and social outcomes.The idea that two or three national states can regulate the same continental economy is hardly practicable. There will have to be one regulator and one political authority, and, if we want to play a part in that authority we shall have to seek some form of political power-sharing. The alternative would be to leave management of the economy to the US.A political union could take many forms, and it will depend largely on what the United States will eventually accept. It may be that it will take some calamity--another Great Depression, perhaps, or terrorist onslaughts requiring a drastic tightening of continental borders, or an environmental collapse--to move the US to accept some modification of its perfect union. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,029 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».