MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2077169430 · doi:10.1007/s00415-013-7237-z

Walther Riese (1890–1976)

2014· article· en· W2077169430 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Frank W. Stahnisch, Stephen Pow

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Neurology · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMental Health and Psychiatry
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Mots-clésNeuroradiologyNeurologyMedicinePhilosophyPsychologyNeuroscience

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Owing to advances in the understanding of neurophysiological responses to high-stress situations, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has become a topic of widespread attention in recent years. While anthropologist Allan Young depicts PTSD as an “invented” product of contemporary psychiatric approaches, this deviates slightly from scholarship that holds that PTSD-like conditions preceded the American Psychiatric Association’s acceptance of the very notion in DSM III (1980) [10]. What appears as a contemporary phenomenon is the intensifying debate surrounding the socio-ethical ramifications of neurological and psychiatric assessments of PTSD within judicial proceedings related to financial compensation claims [4]. However, German neurologist and psychiatrist Walther Riese’s (1890–1976) efforts to assist the claims of veterans suffering from traumatic neurosis (Unfallneurose) following World War One suggest that the modern debate is not without antecedents (Fig. ​(Fig.11). Fig. 1 Photograph of Walther Riese (ca. 1914). From: Eiswirth I (1983) Walther Riese (1890–1976)—Leben und Werk, Cologne, Diss Med, p. 7 Walther Riese was born as the youngest of eight children to affluent parents in Berlin’s highly assimilated Jewish community and led a sheltered childhood. While Riese demonstrated a logical mind, he showed early aptitude for the humanities that became evident throughout his life. Decades later, a colleague would note that he was equally adept in German, English, and French when he wrote on topics in the history of neurology and neuroethics, while his elaborate style resembled that of the seventeenth-century philosophers he admired [6]. Riese passed his exams at the University of Berlin in 1914, and since physicians were needed for Germany’s war effort, he was soon sent to the University of Koenigsberg, where he earned his doctorate, serving as assistant to psychiatrist Ernst Meyer (1871–1931). It is interesting to note with respect to Riese’s defence of the legitimacy of Unfallneurose that he himself suffered nervous exhaustion during his first winter in Koenigsberg, becoming a patient at the same clinic where he had worked with the many war-traumatized soldiers. This was only alleviated by the prolonged visit of his new bride, and later child psychiatrist, Hertha Riese (1892–1981) [3]. Walther Riese’s views, however, owe more to his research at the University of Frankfurt’s Institute for Research into the Long-term Effects of Brain Injuries (1917–1933). Here he was brought into what would prove a lifelong collaboration with neurologist Kurt Goldstein (1878–1965) whose clinical observations of thousands of patients led him to a holistic view of neurological function, which Riese came to share [5]. Riese’s later Principles of Neurology in Light of their Present Use (1950) further acknowledged Swiss neurologist Constantin von Monakow’s (1853–1930) related work as a powerful influence. World War One had left approximately 300,000 German veterans diagnosed by neurologists and psychiatrists as suffering from war neurosis. However, in the atmosphere of financial collapse that characterized Weimar Germany, much hostility from state administrators greeted the returning “pension neurotics” who were seen as a burden to an overtaxed welfare system [2]. Correspondingly, neurologists and psychiatrists providing assessments (Klinikgutachten) to the National Insurance System decided frequently in favour of the insurers’ interests. Riese’s rejection of this practice found expression in the publication of Die Unfallneurose (1929), which likewise is an early document of his concerns with neuroethical problems: “The problem of the Unfallneurose amounts to a problem only in so far as it relates to the critical and decisive interference of the physician with the patient.” [7]. Riese’s career in Germany ended with the Nazi takeover in January of 1933. Walther, as a Jewish physician, and Hertha, who headed a socialist ambulatory and birth control clinic in Frankfurt, immediately found themselves in prison. The particular reason provided for their arrest was the book Die Unfallneurose, which had so roundly denounced the conduct of state authorities, earning the couple many powerful enemies [3]. They and their two daughters only narrowly escaped to Switzerland in March, before continuing to France with the help of a Rockefeller research fellowship. Here, Riese re-established a research program on comparative neuroanatomy at the University of Lyon, until the conquest of France by the Wehrmacht (1940) again put their lives in danger. They managed to escape through Vichy France to Rabat, Morocco when another Rockefeller fellowship allowed them to reach the United States [9]. Supported by letters of reference from his mentor Goldstein, who had emigrated to New York in 1935, Riese found a reliable home in the Virginia Medical College in Richmond, where he first served as a neurological researcher and later in the capacity of a professor of neuroanatomy and history of medicine (1941–1976). He continued to write prodigiously, though his publications moved further and further away from Goldstein’s “holistic neurology.” Between 1959 and 1975, Riese concentrated on courses with history of medicine and neuroethical content, which also found their way into the fellowship program of the American Academy of Neurology and panels at the American Association for the History of Medicine. Some of Riese’s more notable works are The Conception of Disease (1955) and A History of Neurology (1959). In his philosophical views, Riese now advocated for ethical considerations based on a deep analysis of history and its present uses, the alignment of medical decision-making with clinical experiences, along with the teaching of neuroethical content to medical students and practitioners—all at a time when the term of “neuroethics” had not even appeared in the literature [8]. In 1969, near the end of his life, Riese’s pioneering work in traumatology, neurohistory and neuroethics was also recognized in his former homeland. As part of the process of redress for Nazi crimes (Wiedergutmachung), Riese finally received an honorary title of Professor Emeritus at Frankfurt University, where he had so extensively worked during the interwar period [1]. We are grateful for support from the Mackie Family Collection in the History of Neuroscience, the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, the Institute for Public Health (all: Calgary), the Rockefeller Archive Center (New York), and an Open Operating Grant (no/EOG-123690) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. We graciously thank Dr. Darwin Stapleton (Rockefeller Archive Center) and Dr. Paul Weindling (Oxford Centre for the History of Medicine) for their assistance.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,639
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2014
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of NeurologyMême sujetMental Health and PsychiatryTravaux en français237 207