MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2077351201 · doi:10.1097/olq.0b013e31817e9228

Two Lymphogranuloma Venereum Cases in a Heterosexual Couple in Bilbao (Spain)

2008· article· en· W2077351201 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josefina López de Munain, Guillermo Ezpeleta, Manuel Imaz, Maria Del Mar Camara, Valentine Esteban, Juan Miguel Santamaría, R Cisterna

Notice bibliographique

RevueSexually Transmitted Diseases · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueReproductive tract infections research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLymphogranuloma venereumMedicineMen who have sex with menChlamydia trachomatisUrethritisSex organOutbreakDemographyTransmission (telecommunications)Genital ulcerChlamydiaGynecologySexually transmitted diseaseVirologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Internal medicineSyphilisImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

LYMPHOGRANULOMA VENEREUM (LGV) WAS AN unusual disease in industrialized countries until 4 years ago; before this when it did appear, it had generally been acquired in some endemic area (Africa, Asia, South America, or the Caribbean Islands). In December 2003, an outbreak of LGV was detected in Rotterdam, Netherlands.1 Since then, more than 1000 cases have been reported in the Netherlands, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, Sweden, Portugal, Denmark, and Spain.2–10 In the United States and Canada, the first cases were recorded in 2004 and between then and November 2006, 85 cases were reported in Canada.1,11 All these cases had remarkably uniform characteristics: men who have sex with men (MSM), a high rate of HIV seropositivity and frequent concurrent infection with other STIs. Most of them had rectal symptoms and only a few inguinal lymphadenopathy or classic genital ulcers.12 All confirmed cases were of the genotype L2. There was no evidence that this infection had extended beyond these nuclear groups, until 3 LGV cases were reported among Portuguese women during 2007.9 The aim of this article is to describe the first LGV cases diagnosed in a heterosexual couple in Bilbao (Spain). We directly documented sexual transmission by identifying genital Chlamydia trachomatis type L2 infection in both patients. The results also suggest that primary classic LGV can take the form of urethritis and cervicitis, without genital ulceration. A further 2 cases of LGV had previously been recorded in Spain, but both of them were in MSM.10 In June 2006, a 33-year-old Spanish man came to see us complaining of 2 months of gradually progressive and painful right inguinal lymphadenopathy (swelling). The onset of swelling was accompanied by radiating low back pain, myalgia in the lower extremities, and dysuria. He denied any history of previous genital ulceration, inguinal buboes, fever, malaise, proctitis, or urethral discharge. His general practitioner had treated him with an antibiotic and antiinflammatory drug whose name he did not know. Dysuria remitted with treatment but the swelling did not. The patient reported multiple unprotected heterosexual contacts during the previous year but he had not traveled abroad. He also denied having had sexual intercourse with men or immigrants. Physical examination revealed bilateral inguinal lymph nodes of firm consistency, those on the right being bigger. Urethral, rectal, and pharyngeal samples were taken for microbiologic diagnosis. Samples for direct fluorescent antibody and culture for C. trachomatis were negative. So were culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and herpes simplex virus. There was no serological evidence of syphilis or HIV infection. The laboratory extracted DNA from all samples using the Amplicor CT/NG extraction kit and tested them for C. trachomatis using an in-house TaqMan real-time PCR assay, which targeted the cryptic plasmid. C. trachomatis PCR was positive in the urethral sample and negative in other sites. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the right lymph node was performed during a second visit in July 2006. The material obtained was processed in the same way as described above and C. trachomatis PCR was positive. Urethral and lymph node DNA samples were tested for LGV using a TaqMan based real-time PCR that used the polymorphic membrane protein H gene as a PCR target.13 The results of this assay were positive. Both samples were identified as LGV serovar 2 and not L2b genovar, by sequencing an ompA segment spanning variable segments 1 and 2 using an ABI Genetic Analyzer 3130 and Big Dye Terminator kit version 3.1 according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The man’s partner, a 29 year-old Spanish woman, described a history of painful bilateral inguinal swellings. She was 8-weeks pregnant and denied any sexual contact other than with her partner over the previous 2 years. Examination found painless bilateral inguinal nodes of firm consistency. Vaginal, endocervical, and pharyngeal samples were collected for routine STI microbiologic testing. Direct fluorescent antibody for C. trachomatis and samples cultured for N. gonorrhoeae and herpes simplex virus were negative. All serological tests for syphilis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV infection were negative. The laboratory extracted DNA from all samples and processed them in the same way described for her partner’s samples. C. trachomatis PCR and culture was positive for the endocervical sample and negative for other sites. The C.trachomatis strain was determined as L2 genotype and was confirmed using the same method as for her partner’s samples. The man was treated with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 21 days and the woman with erythromycin 500 mg 4 times daily for the same period.14 Both partners improved clinically after treatment. Repeated PCR samples that were collected in a follow-up visit 4 weeks after treatment were negative in both individuals. This report on LGV in both members of a heterosexual couple is interesting for several reasons. First, we have not found any documented cases of LGV in heterosexual couples during the past 2 decades. Second, although primary rectal infection in MSM is the dominant clinical presentation of LGV in Europe, our results show that classic genital-inguinal LGV continues to present from time to time. It is also important to notice that C. trachomatis L2 and not the L2b genovar was detected in both partners. The C. trachomatis L2b genovar is far more common in MSM and it is the predominant genovar isolated in the outbreaks described in Europe.1,2,5,6,15–17 Third, C. trachomatis L2 serovar was documented in the genital tracts of both partners and the male’s lymph node specimen but no genital ulceration was found. LGV is historically described as having a genital ulcer component, but the genital ulcer is often not documented.18,19 It may be possible that the urethra and cervix are common, even the usual, primary infection sites of LGV in heterosexual men and women, just as the primary infection in MSM is primarily rectal. These 2 reported cases are not enough to answer this question, but they contribute to emphasize the uncertainties about the primary infection site in LGV cases. Clinicians should be alert to detecting new cases of LGV regardless of clinical presentation or sexual orientation of the patient. LGV cases may be missed if this diagnosis is not considered or if appropriate diagnostic tools are not available and patients may remain undiagnosed and develop severe complications apart from continued dissemination of C. trachomatis infection. With modern DNA amplification technology, it may be less necessary to rely on serological diagnosis. Serology has always been imprecise, and it is likely that nowadays, more laboratories have good DNA amplification experience than C. trachomatis serology experience. It therefore seems that we should focus on the problems LGV presents and provide new tools to improve diagnosis and epidemiologic surveillance of LGV infections.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,115
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations22
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSexually Transmitted DiseasesMême sujetReproductive tract infections researchTravaux en français237 207