MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2077460317 · doi:10.4103/2231-0746.147171

The Hanoi Declaration

2014· article· en· W2077460317 sur OpenAlexaff
Nagato Natsume, David S. Precious, Kenneth E. Salyer, Toko Hayakawa

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of Maxillofacial Surgery · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueCleft Lip and Palate Research
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCongenital malformationsDentistryPregnancyPediatrics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir, Cleft lip and palate is one of the most common congenital anomalies. Cleft lip and palate are seen in approximately 1/500 newborn babies. Based on this prevalence, approximately 14 million people suffer from cleft lip and palate on this planet.[1] Despite the fact that cleft lip and palate is one of the most common congenital anomalies, more than 30% of mothers of children with cleft lip and palate consider committing suicide.[2] Currently, children with cleft lip and palate may receive orthodontic treatment such as an artificial palatal plate with a nasal stent during infancy before the surgery for a potentially better outcome. Moreover, surgeries for clefts have improved, and children with clefts get better outcomes from several surgeries and other advanced treatments such as bone grafting. The technique of cleft lip and palate treatment has improved such that appropriate treatment does not leave any functional problem in children with cleft lip and palate. Children with treated cleft lip and palate can now stand as peers beside children without cleft and positively contribute to the development of their country. In spite of this fact, there remains the unspoken problem which threatens developing children with clefts. That is abortion. Fortunately medical treatment keeps on evolving relentlessly, but the progression sometimes can cause unintended consequences. With the progression of diagnostic imaging, mothers get prenatal diagnoses of children with clefts at an early stage of their pregnancy, and, as a result, many unborn children with clefts are killed by abortion. The congenital oral clefts obviously are located in the oral region. From the other point of view, it may be said that mothers do not kill their kindergarten-age children if they sustain an injury of their oral cavity. The reason mothers choose abortion is because their children are still fetuses as well as there is knowledge of proper available treatment. It is well known, the operation for cleft lip and palate takes only a couple of hours. It should be emphasized that the appropriate treatment does not leave any functional problem in children, and children can grow to be a helpful human resource for the country. It is extremely sad but due to the myth that cleft lip and palate is a permanent unavoidable disability, lives of many children with cleft lip and palate are claimed for this reason. An awareness campaign and formulation of recommendations about this cleft condition are required. We must cease performing abortion for reasons related to the existence of congenital anomalies such as cleft lip and palate, which can be fully rehabilitated by treatment. We spent 3 years in discussion of this subject and at the International Cleft Lip and Palate Foundation Congress in Hanoi on 25th December 2013, “The Hanoi Declaration” was published and distributed. The International cleft lip and palate foundation will also make manuals and DVDs to educate parents of children with clefts and will request ratification and approval of WHO and governments. It is obvious that there are great challenges in order to save “Fetal lives.” With the hope of healthy growth of children with clefts, your approval of the Hanoi declaration helps your friends and families learn about it more. Love for mankind and to act to the best of our ability within the limits of our means are required to save fetus' lives and support mothers. The first step is your approval of the Hanoi Declaration and to make it widely known by people around you. The Hanoi Declaration requests your understanding and help.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,126
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,421

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1260,036

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,070
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of Maxillofacial SurgeryMême sujetCleft Lip and Palate ResearchTravaux en français237 207