Criteria for Ranking Realizations in the Investigation of SAGD Reservoir Performance
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Geostatistical techniques are being increasingly used to generate reservoir models and quantify uncertainty in reservoir properties. This is achieved through the construction of multiple realizations constrained by all available data. A large number of realizations are required to capture the extreme low and high cases. Not all realizations can be used in simulation. However, randomly selecting realizations will result inaccurate represent of the uncertainty. This paper presents a methodology for ranking the constructed realizations to reduce the number that must be processed in flow simulation. The ranking methodology is customized for a gravity drainage process where the well locations are specified. Although this ranking procedure is not general for a variety of recovery processes, it is particularly suited to steamassisted gravity drainage (SAGD) production. The ranking measure is highly correlated to performance parameters such as cumulative steam oil ratio (CSOR) and cumulative oil production rate (COPrate.). The ranking measure quantifies the local connected hydrocarbon volume within a local window for the SAGD reservoir. The local window represents the distribution of reservoir properties and location of the production well. A large number of flow simulations were undertaken to illustrate that ranking measure works. Results show that ranking with connected hydrocarbon volume (CHV) can be correlated to SAGD performance parameters. High correlation achieved when ranking of CHV performed through simple static and after calibrating with different windows size. Introduction Ranking is a useful geostatistical tool that is being widely used for reservoir analysis where significant variations are present in the reservoir properties. Efficient reservoir performance prediction requires an efficient ranking methodology before flow simulation to provide an accurate estimation of the reservoir properties and quantify the uncertainty associated with those properties. For predicting the recovery of hydrocarbon, understanding the geostatistical models is very important and has been given a great deal of attention. It is well known that uncertainty exists in oil and gas reservoirs. This uncertainty must be quantified for improved reservoir management. SAGD is an in-situ heavy oil recovery process. The process was invented by Roger Butler1 in 1970. Two parallel horizontal wells with vertical spacing of about 5m are drilled in the formation. The upper well is a steam injection well where steam heats the formation to increase the temperature and reduce the viscosity of the oil. The lower well is the production well where the heated oil can be drained and then pumped to the surface. A gravity driving force is introduced by injecting a steam in to the upper well. During the steam injection steam will rise and form a steam chamber, this process depends on the efficient connection of the steam chamber to the surrounding reservoir. Viscosity is an important issue in heavy oil production and lowering it is part of the SAGD process. The success of a SAGD project depends on controlling some parameters such as steam injection rate to minimize SOR and maximize the COPrate. Numerical reservoir models of porosity, permeability, fluid saturation and facies that are required for flow simulation are generated using geostatistical techniques.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle