A Tale of 2s: Optimizing Maternal—Child Health in the Context of Antenatal Maternal Depression and Antidepressant Use
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abbreviations 5-HT serotonin AD antidepressant LBW low birth weight MDD major depressive disorder PTB preterm birth SSRI selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor Not a week goes by without new studies reporting on depression during and outcomes following exposure to prenatal SSRIs. Recent public and scientific attention has focused on interpreting contrasting reports of increased risk for congenital anomalies - particularly vascular and cardiac defects' and the apparent lack of risks related to SSRI exposure.21 Reports of neurobehavioural disturbances associated with prenatal SSRI exposure5·6 contrast with other studies that find no increased developmental vulnerability.1·7 This constantly evolving literature raises scientific8 and public9·10 concern about managing mood disorders during pregnancy and conceptualizing the responsible inclusion of pregnant women in medical research.12·13 In this issue of The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2 key papers address this pressing question.14·15 The paper by Dr Dan Rurak and colleagues (see Shea et al14) highlights key factors that influence fetal drug exposure, and presumably influence the long-term developmental consequences of prenatal drug exposure. Given the variable outcomes associated with pharmacotherapy, the paper by Dr Sherryl H Goodman and Dr Sona Dimidjian15 offers a developmental psychopathology perspective and promising evidence for psychosocial interventions to treat depression during pregnancy. These 2 perspectives offer ways to optimize antenatal mental health treatment and pharmacotherapy to minimize fetal drug exposure. As clinicians, we are frequently faced with questions about how best to promote optimal care for mothers and support development and behaviour in the children of mothers who were depressed during pregnancy. As antenatal maternal mood disorders themselves influence infant and child behaviour,16·17 we are challenged to provide appropriate and timely care when both antenatal SSRI and maternal mood effects are often indistinguishable. To appreciate the impact of these prenatal exposures, we recognize the interplay of 3 key features influencing child development in this setting. This is a story of interplay between the 2s: 2 environmental pathogens - exposure to depressed-anxious maternal mood and SSRI ADs; 2 time periods - spanning pre- and postnatal periods; and 2 highly interrelated individuals, spanning 2 generations - the mother and her infant. Accounting for the ongoing interplay between these factors is essential, but our current understanding of the impact, both of SSRI medications and of psychiatric disorders, on early human development limit our ability to distinguish between the impact of disease and treatment. The incidence and period prevalence of MDDs during are 7.5% and 12.7%, respectively.'8 Although MDD is common, only 1 in 5 Americans receive any guideline-concordant intervention, and most are inadequately treated.6 Treatment rates for mood disorders are even lower for pregnant women (14%) than in the general population of women (26%).7 Pregnancy frequently results in discontinuation of both psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, and women do not resume care in the postpartum period.8 Most women do not receive prescriptions for ADs beyond 6 weeks of gestation. Pregnant women who discontinue ADs proximate to conception have a higher risk for relapse (68%), compared with those who maintain treatment (26%). Although psychotherapy is the preferred treatment of most women,6 it is neither available in all practice settings nor accessible for some mothers. Low treatment rates are juxtaposed against mounting evidence that MDD increases multiple risks for the pregnant woman and fetus. Gestational MDD is associated with risk directly related to the physiological sequelae of psychiatric illness as well as secondary to associated maternal behaviours, such as smoking, poor nutrition, substance abuse, inadequate obstetrical care, and interpersonal isolation and suicide. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,013 | 0,016 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».