Using Synchrotron-Based FTIR Microspectroscopy To Reveal Chemical Features of Feather Protein Secondary Structure: Comparison with Other Feed Protein Sources
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Studying the secondary structure of proteins leads to an understanding of the components that make up a whole protein. An understanding of the structure of the whole protein is often vital to understanding its digestive behavior in animals and nutritive quality. Usually protein secondary structures include alpha-helix and beta-sheet. The percentages of these two structures in protein secondary structures may influence feed protein quality and digestive behavior. Feathers are widely available as a potential protein supplement. They are very high in protein (84%), but the digestibility of the protein is very low (5%). The objective of this study was to use synchrotron-based Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) microspectroscopy to reveal chemical features of feather protein secondary structure within amide I at ultraspatial resolution (pixel size = 10 x 10 microm), in comparison with other protein sources from easily digested feeds such as barley, oat, and wheat tissue at endosperm regions (without destruction of their inherent structure). This experiment was performed at beamline U2B of the Albert Einstein Center for Synchrotron Biosciences at the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) in Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), U.S. Dept of Energy (NSLS-BNL, Upton, NY). The results showed that ultraspatially resolved chemical imaging of feed protein secondary structure in terms of beta-sheet to alpha-helix peak height ratio by stepping in pixel-sized increments was obtained. Using synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy can distinguish structures of protein amide I among the different feed protein sources. The results show that the secondary structure of feather protein differed from those of other feed protein sources in terms of the line-shape and position of amide I. The feather protein amide I peaked at approximately 1630 cm(-1). However, other feed protein sources showed a peak at approximately 1650 cm(-1). By using multicomponent peak modeling, the relatively quantitative amounts of alpha-helix and beta-sheet in protein secondary structure were obtained, which showed that feather contains 88% beta-sheet and 4% alpha-helix, barley contains 17% beta-sheet and 71% alpha-helix, oat contains 2% beta-sheet and 92% alpha-helix, and wheat contains 42% beta-sheet and 50% alpha-helix. The difference in percentage of protein secondary structure may be part of the reason for different feed protein digestive behaviors. These results demonstrate the potential of highly spatially resolved infrared microspectroscopy to reveal feed protein secondary structure. Information from this study by the infrared probing of feed protein secondary structure may be valuable as a guide for feed breeders to improve and maintain protein quality for animal use.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».