MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2078590915 · doi:10.1097/wno.0b013e3181b1b44b

35th Annual Meeting of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society (NANOS), Lake Tahoe, Nevada, February 21-26, 2009

2009· article· en· W2078590915 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonathan D. Trobe

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPresentation (obstetrics)OphthalmologyMedicineLibrary scienceHistoryCartographyArt historyOptometryGeographySurgeryComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The 35th Annual North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society (NANOS) Meeting drew 375 attendees to Lake Tahoe, Nevada, from February 21 to 26, 2009. Among the attending neuro-ophthalmologists were 46 from outside North America (United Kingdom, 9; France, 8; Australia, 5; Switzerland, 4; Israel, Korea, and Singapore, 3; Denmark, Germany, Japan, and Sweden, 2; and Belgium, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, 1). The Walsh Meeting, traditionally held on the first day and organized superbly by Timothy J. McCulley, MD (San Francisco, CA), produced the usual wild and crazy cases (19) enhanced with trenchant and witty commentary by invited neuroradiologist Christine M. Glastonbury, MBBS and neuropathologist Andrew W. Bollen, MD, DMV, both of the University of California-San Francisco (UCSF). The winner of the prize for best Walsh presentation by a fellow was Sashank Prasad, MD, University of Pennsylvania, for his presentation: “Hear No Evil, See No Evil,” which turned out to be MELAS (mitochondrial encephalopathy lactic acidosis with stroke-like episodes). The following days included 25 scientific platform presentations culled from a record number of submissions. Divya Aggarwal, MD, Doheny Eye Institute, won the award for the best platform presentation by a fellow for “Melanopsin Retinal Ganglion Cells: A New Class of Cells in Human Retina.” There were 100 posters on view, 10 of which were chosen for a discussion moderated by Steven Galetta, MD (Philadelphia, PA) and Lynn K. Gordon, MD, PhD (Los Angeles, CA). Sally Chang, University of Pennsylvania, won the prize for the best poster by a medical student; her title was “MS Functional Composite Scores with a Visual Component Added Capture Axonal Loss in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.” Daniel Barthelmes, MD, University of Zurich (Switzerland), won the award for the best poster by a resident for “Retinal Hemorrhages in High Altitude Mountaineers.” The NANOS 2009 Pilot Grant Award went to Prem S. Subramanian, MD, PhD (Baltimore, MD) for his project entitled “Pilot Study to Measure Diplopic Fields and the Correlation of Diplopic Field Characteristics with Visual Function Quality.” The NANOS 2009 Young Investigator Award went to Michael S. Salman, PhD, MRCP (Winnipeg, Manitoba) for his project entitled “Characteristics of the Cerebellar Dysplasia in Chiari Type II Malformation as Revealed by Ocular Motor Functions.” The Fight For Sight/NANOS Postdoctoral Fellowship Award went to Zoë Williams, MD (Rochester, NY) for her project entitled “Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Optic Nerve in Patients with Congenital and Acquired Optic Disc Elevation.” Robert B. Daroff, MD (Cleveland, OH) delivered the 2nd Jacobson Lecture. At the closing banquet, Mark J. Kupersmith, MD (New York, NY) received the NANOS Distinguished Service Award. Peter J. Savino, MD (San Diego, CA) was recognized as having given the 7th Hoyt Lecture at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. The next (36th) NANOS meeting will take place at the Marriott Star Pass Resort in Tucson, AZ, from March 7 to 11, 2010. Jonathan D. Trobe, MD Ann Arbor, MISashank Prasad, MD, University of Pennsylvania (left), accepts the prize for the best Walsh presentation by a fellow.Divya Aggarwal, MD, Doheny Eye Institute (left), accepts the award for the best platform presentation by a fellow.Daniel Barthelmes, MD, University of Zurich (Switzerland) (left), receives the award for the best poster by a resident.Prem Subramanian, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University (right), receives the NANOS 2009 Pilot Grant Award from Jeffrey Bennett, MD, PhD (Denver, CO).James Sharpe, MD (Toronto, ON) accepts the NANOS 2009 Young Investigator Award on behalf of Michael S. Salman, PhD, MRCP (Winnipeg, MB).Zoe Williams, MD (Rochester, NY) accepts the Fight For Sight/NANOS Postdoctoral Fellowship Award.Mark J. Kupersmith, MD, New York, NY, accepts the NANOS Distinguished Service Award.Joseph Rizzo, MD (Boston, MA), Susan Pepin, MD (Hanover, NH), Wayne Cornblath, MD (Ann Arbor, MI), Agnes Wong, MD, PhD (Toronto, ON), Swaraj Bose, MD (Irvine, CA), and Ivy Dreizin, MD (Madison, WI).Steven Galetta, MD (Philadelphia, PA), Isla Williams, MD (Melbourne, Australia), Lynn Gordon, MD, PhD (Los Angeles, CA), and Bradley Katz, MD, PhD (Salt Lake City, UT).Grace Kao, MD, MPH (Irvine, CA) and Janet Rucker, MD (New York, NY) accept certificates as NANOS Fellows.Boogying by Patty Johnston-McNussen, MD (Urbana, IL), Mark Borchert, MD (Los Angeles, CA), Sophia Chung, MD (St. Louis, MO), and Sharon Johnstone, MD (Phoenix, AZ).NANOS President Anthony Arnold, MD (Los Angeles, CA) thanks Janel Fick, NANOS Executive Director, for her superb organizational effort at the 35th Annual NANOS Meeting.Posing by the 2009 NANOS Board Members (front row, left to right): Deborah Friedman, MD (Rochester, NY), Leah Levi, MD (San Diego, CA), Jane Warner, MD (Salt Lake City, UT), Lyn Sedwick, MD (Orlando, FL), Valerie Biousse, MD (Atlanta, GA), Thomas Carlow, MD (Albuquerque, NM); (back row, left to right): Eric Eggenberger, DO (East Lansing, MI), Preston Calvert, MD (Alexandria, VA), Edward Fitzgibbon, MD (Bethesda, MD), Larry Frohman, MD (Newark, NJ), Anthony Arnold, MD (Los Angeles, CA).Jane Daroff with Louis Dell'Osso, PhD (Cleveland, OH).Jeffrey Odel, MD (New York, NY).Dan Milea, MD (Copenhagen, Denmark), Luis Mejico, MD (Syracuse, NY), and Jorge Kattah, MD (Peoria, IL).Eric Eggenberger, DO (East Lansing, MI) and Fiona Costello, MD, FRCP (Calgary, AB).Edward Margolin, MD (Toronto, ON), Kara Warden, MD (Ann Arbor, MI), and Wayne Cornblath (Ann Arbor, MI).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,127
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologyMême sujetGlaucoma and retinal disordersTravaux en français237 207